The aging population is good for business, the economy and society. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this day and age, sentiments diverge on the aging population is not beneficial to the national economy. Although it can be justified to some certain extent, I hold the opposite stance that it is ignored owing to some rational reasons.
It is irrefutable that the proportion of elderly people growing, and the country's economic situation also faces some pitfalls. In fact, it is inevitable to understand that an aging population is always associated with a shortage of labor resources. As a result, industrialized countries are facing a severe labor crisis due to long life expectancy and aging populations. Hence, countries are on the verge of economic recession. Second, if the country has a small population of young people, then reduce the rate of foreign direct investment because most services now need young workers. Therefore, investors are not confident enough to invest. Hence, the country lost a lot of investment capital.
Conversely, the significant appearance of an over-the-hill population also offers multiple advantages. The first superior side is medical. Due to the number of elderly people needing health care services. Thereby, to be suitable for serving the needs of the elderly, medical facilities require medical technology and service quality to develop. That is pleasant for the future of the country later and to grow the national economy from the profits of medical facilities. Furthermore, a senescent population means they are well-considered citizens. Since then, society has reduced the crime rate because of the fact that juvenile crime is the majority.
To sum up, the problems of an older population cause little damage to the situation of countries. Personally, I think that when people live longer, it is a testament to social development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Trandinhphuc8.0 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | steveminh | 89 | view |
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...hen, society has reduced the crime rate because of the fact that juvenile crime is the majority. To su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, i think, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99466352992 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59219858156 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5244521042 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3333333333 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114950410706 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312330865509 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361106308273 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640404332121 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249382934513 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.