Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Luck is becoming increasingly debatable. Some people believed that a person's achievements in his life's goal are closely linked with luck. In this essay, I will argue why these people believe that luck plays a vital role in human achievements in life.
Some people believe that luck is an absolute imparity in human success, they are of the view that physical features of the human body were given to us by God and some people get attractive personalities which payed way to their success. For instance, a boy with blue eyes known as Bilal belongs to a destitute family gets attention of our media which bolstered his success in modeling. Another tiktoker Dananeer became famous because of her attractive voice, as these things' attractive look and voices are gifts of God that were given to some people by luck also paved the way to their success.
While others people do not believe in these fallacious ideas and they reckon that hard work is an absolute imparity to get success in life because the success which can be achieved by luck is temporary and will be vanished by the cruelties of time, while aims that could be achieved by hard work makes you an immortal in the books of historians. For instance, Thomas Eddison makes a thousand failed experiments with the filament until the final results were achieved and Nguyen Ngoc ky was also a disabled person who was unable to write with his hands but with hard work, he was finally able to write with his feet and became a teacher. These two examples prove that hard work plays an essential role in the achievement of any goal and all notions related to luck are just exceptional cases in certain demographics of society.
Wrapping it up, I entirely disagree with this fallacious belief that luck plays a vital role in fulfillment of to aim, instead, I believe that hard work is necessary for success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-30 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | briona2006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Rosie Holmes | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Rosie Holmes | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | minh phương phạm hồng | 78 | view |
- Overpopulation in urban areas has lead to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 56
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 84
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high sugar levels which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar agree or disagree 73
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Studies show that crime rates are lower among those with educational degrees Therefore the best way to reduce the crime rate is to educate criminals while they are still in prison Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74074074074 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50054101752 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515432098765 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8663341002 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.6 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183375735249 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832602262316 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481387522262 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120093803462 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465452529845 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.