Some people say we do not need printed paper newspaper anymore. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The proliferation of technology in recent decades has marked its impacts in innumerable aspects of life. One of them is the shift in the way people receive information. Some people suggest that the role of the printed newspaper is no longer needed. I somewhat agree with this view as the production of the conventional newspapers may take its toll on the environment and new technological equipment is a more useful replacement, even though the old-fashioned media channel appears as beneficial in some circumstances.
Given the advent of new technological advancements, the need for the conventional newspaper might not be necessary. There has been a growing trend that people deploy smart devices for attaining news as the online news is stored in portable handheld devices, varies regarding information available, and offers users up-to-the-minute news. By comparison, printed newspapers seem to be difficult to carry, have a restricted amount of data, and be slow in terms of information updating. This gives online newspaper a distinct advantages over its outdated counterpart. The creation of new technological breakthroughs thus places the newspaper on the brink of disappearance.
Another reason for upholding the elimination of the printed newspaper is the repercussions the media platform has on the environment. It is thought that the manufacture of newspapers, which demands trees as the main material, is one of the main culprits of deforestation, the phenomenon that not only deteriorates nature but exacerbates the existing pollution level on the earth. If people read the news on the internet, the human impacts on the environment may be ameliorated. Thus, utilization of the conventional newspaper may act as a catalyst for the deterioration of biodiversity.
Admittedly, there are certain benefits associated with traditional news designs. The primary merit is that newspapers do not contain distractions similar to the digital news. This is deeply rooted in the nature of technical devices, which are created to serve multi-faceted functions for users, which may prompt unwanted disturbances to people. In this case, the newspaper may be superior to modern technical gadgets. People; however, can adjust their settings in order to relieve such spam.
In sum, I mostly side with those who believe that printed newspaper is insignificant in today's world as smart devices and computers offer better experiences and produce less carbon footprint.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born What is your opinion 73
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rees as the main material, is one of the main culprits of deforestation, the phen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52105263158 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29458129782 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4381508908 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.421052632 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21052631579 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190908382617 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568220129625 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442426333569 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992676285495 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341780029513 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.