The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
The issue asserts that the mind of the human will always superior to machines because the machines are only tools of human minds. Some might argue that machine had already outstriped human thought since the development of Alpha Go. However, these creations are made by human himself and therefore cannot win over mankind.
It is true that some machines seem to win over some human beings. In the case of Alpha Go, for example, had won the game of Go from the world champion of mankind. Since Go is a game involving with strong consciousness, some might think that the machine has better mind than humans. However, if you look closer on how Alpha Go has developed, the preceded assert can be changed. The main source of algorithm that the Alpha Go depend on, is the previous human verses human game output. Since these game results are made solely by human, we can not see that the machine had overcome human mind.
The fundamental of machine is a tool made by human for efficiency in work. To make a tool, contemplate thinking is needed beforehand. This involves understanding the limitation of the environment surrounding to finding the right solution for the current uneasiness. Therefore, to create something, there must be more broaden observation than the tools we are using. As a result, since the creation of tools are limited in human mind, it is impossible for the machine to win over human. On to that, more powerful machine has been developed to win over Alpha Go. These creations are also made by humans.
Furthermore, machine's birth has to be within human calculation. For example, many artificial intelligence developed nowadays, cannot actually become independant from human touches. There might be a possibility that some day it may become independant from human, but now it is not. You can see from the current case, Chat GPT. Many experts claim that it is the cutting edge technology human has ever made. The power of this machine outweigh any other man made machine. However, even with this power, there are many errors made in this machine that huamn can easily fix. Moreover, these alogorithms are guided by man made code, and cannot derive out from the actual instruction.
In conclusion, it is agreeable that the emergence of new machines might win some of human minds. However, the creation of these machines are simply made by human minds. Moreover, even with this advancement, it still cannot win over human kind. As more and more powerful machines made by humans increase, there is no way that the machine will beat human mind. Therefore, I agree with the issue above.
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg s Chamber of Commerce Last October the city of Belleville installed high intensity lighting in its central business district and vandalism there declined within a month The city of Am 70
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people should always tell the truth
- If the government is somewhat underfunded economically which part or two of the city could be cut Reduce the redundancy of personnel in the city hall Replace the plants that require frequent maintenance in the park lawn with plants that do not require fre 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun intelligence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much artificial intelligence', 'a good deal of artificial intelligence'.
Suggestion: much artificial intelligence; a good deal of artificial intelligence
... within human calculation. For example, many artificial intelligence developed nowadays, cannot actually bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8690744921 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54537470262 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453724604966 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1376870618 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8888888889 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4074074074 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.48148148148 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476671249564 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15127860324 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166875537717 0.0758088955206 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327949958463 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126766038505 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun intelligence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much artificial intelligence', 'a good deal of artificial intelligence'.
Suggestion: much artificial intelligence; a good deal of artificial intelligence
... within human calculation. For example, many artificial intelligence developed nowadays, cannot actually bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8690744921 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54537470262 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453724604966 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1376870618 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8888888889 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4074074074 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.48148148148 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476671249564 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15127860324 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166875537717 0.0758088955206 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327949958463 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126766038505 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.