Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
It is convinced that a few people tend to give information about scientific research, business, and the academic world without pay it whereas others prefer to spent money for gain the knowledge. Personaly, I definitely on the same way that we have to unpay to obtain the erudition.
As a paragraph explainer, the main benefit is some persons have a faith that share their abilities for anyone freely would bring happiness. It is because when they have something to give with others, they feel useful especially in the subject that they have mastered. For the model, many volunteer teachers who teach in a remote place would gain pleased when they could contribute to build the quality of human resources in that area through education. In short, there are present people that regard their abilities for the welfare of others are more valuable.
Even so, there are some drawbacks if people want to earn several advantages from the information. Firstly, many students are less interested to learn something caused by they must pay it. We know that, they have limited money from their parents making them could not do anything that they want. As proof, lots of pupils prefer to choose the activity that it did not need money or free such as a seminar about biology or others as they have realized the limited of their money. As the result, the payment of knowledge are not suitable for students that could not earn their own funding. Secondly, the knowledge are only gotten by the people who have much money so it could affect the gapping of knowledge. It is due to, there are many inhabitants choose to use their salary for their daily needed rather than for paying the materials of business or education. For example, the parents in the village could not give more money for their children because they need it for fullfil their daily needed so their children could not buy books or following some events about education. Thus, the knowledge is only for people who could pay it.
To sum up where my track, giving some free articles or journals for readers could bring lots of benefit than the disadvantages that every single must know about it to avoid the distances of knowledge among people.
- The graph show changes in spending habit of people in UK between 1971 and 2001 73
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below about the highest level of education of women in someland in 1945 and 1995 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart explained the percentage of households with electrical appliances and the number of hours of housework per week in 1920 to 2019 84
- Police budget 2017 2018 and how the money was spent 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he distances of knowledge among people.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, even so, for example, in short, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79947229551 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37920996718 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496042216359 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3548769928 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6875 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968504313267 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380993529673 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483404622837 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730579376003 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421702604126 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.