The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given diagram illustrates the layout of modern landfill for domestic waste decomposition.
Overall, the construction of the landfill is buried underground with two layers. It is also noticeable that there are two types of waste, and the gas one is transferred back to the household.
About the construction, it is a big hole dug into the ground. Under the hole lies a layer of natural rock to prevent leakage. The main part is the waste tank of a synthetic material which is surrounded by a clay layer to isolate the soil around. A system of pipes connecting to the house is installed, and a drainage tank also laid out.
As regards the use, solid waste is thrown into the tank, and the liquid one held in the drainage tank and discharged with the pipe system. In terms of the closure for the decomposition process, the landfill is sealed with a blanket of clay, allowing the solid waste to decay naturally and become a mud-like substance. In addition, the biogas generated from the process is driven back to the residence for various purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The picture below shows the process of growing and making products from pineapples Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below give information about the percentage of the world forest and also the percentage of the timber in five different regions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty in three states in USA Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The table below shows the questionnaire about the opinions of club members and the general public for the new theater in one town in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvanatages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75956284153 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75722998293 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6368845169 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145459023011 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543796551575 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662653763019 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103217479989 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774160368043 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.