Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
Education is always one of the top priorities among nations around the world. However, recently, there is an alarming trend of students struggling to focus at school. This can be explained by the ubiquitous social media applications and rigid adherence to a traditional teaching approach. This essay will shed light on more detailed reasons behind this trend as well as viable long-term solutions for this issue.
One major ground behind the rising trend is distractions from various social media platforms. Due to the fact that today we live in the era of cutting-edge technology, people, particularly youngsters have spent almost their time surfing on the Internet, and watching other mainstream platforms for tremendous purposes. To give an example, Facebook and Instagram recognized and grabbed this opportunity to strive for consistent engagement through positive reinforcement by pushing real-time updates on friends and viral videos. Therefore, the youth may be enchanted and deadly indulged in themselves in those content, thus easily ignoring throughout lessons. Another reason springs from the monotony of classrooms. Many lessons do not quite show the interesting connection between tedious hypotheses and the useful application of real life. Moreover, those lessons are often endorsed a repetitively by the same theoretical assignments. As a result, this method does not create an engaging and dynamic learning motivation for students.
Actions should be taken into consideration in order to tackle this problem and foster inspiration for learners. First and foremost, schools should impose a strict regulation to make use of smartphones while attending classes. All those portable devices could be stored in a secure room and will be returned after class hours. This way would effectively minimize the source of distractions from online networking sites. In addition, educators could work in collaboration with enterprises to integrate factual case studies and engage biographical material about entrepreneurship. After attending courses, pupils are likely to be motivated to concentrate on studying and make remarkable progress. Furthermore, both teachers and mentors should impart knowledge in various methods, particularly incorporating a combination between content and visual infographic or audio to catch students’ attention. Therefore, ensuring higher chances of success after graduation.
In conclusion, a great number of students nowadays pay little attention at school due to the advent of social media platforms and lessons largely irrelevant to their needs. Nevertheless, if schools adopt handset-free classroom policies and modernize the curriculum, students will become more attentive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Even though governments have worked hard to bring about improvements in the healthcare system the overall standard of physical health in developed countries is decreasing What are the potential reasons for this and what are some of the long term effects 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Topic Machines are replacing humans in the manual workforce Do you think the positive effects outweigh the negative effects 89
- Line graph The percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources TV Radio Newspaper Internet 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84924623116 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08678542116 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673366834171 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2823398189 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.818181818 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203158734809 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478347007821 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412954082808 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120194624974 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404231574286 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 78.4519038076 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.