The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph above illustrates the number of products delivered through four distinctive types of transportation, namely road, water, rail and pipeline, displayed in millions of tonnes during the period from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, road transportation remained the primary delivery method throughout the timespan, while the opposite was true for pipelines. Fluctuations were observable from all the categories, but all modes experienced upward trends except for rail, which returned to the starting level.
According to the chart, conveyance by road and rail expressed relatively similar trends, with the former starting at 70 million tonnes while the latter was at 40 million tonnes. Roads witnessed slight fluctuations but still held a steady upward trend throughout the timespan until 1994, and the data ended at a record high of 98 million tonnes, the highest point in the chart in 2002. Meanwhile, rail fell by 5 million tonnes by 1986, then saw a comparable fluctuation like roads for nine years, before rising to 40 million tonnes at the end.
Water-based and pipeline transportation also exhibited synonymous tendencies, with both figures seeing considerable increases, growing from 39 and 2,5 million tonnes to 58 million and 22 million tonnes, respectively, till 1982, at which point the two stayed moderately flat prior to parting ways. Water transport portrayed a subtle curve, then dipped to 50 million tonnes before bouncing back to 62 million. Pipeline, on the other hand, remained at the same level before dropping by 2 million tonnes in 1994 and saw no further changes until the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | cookie12 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | taocute.s1 | 74 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Roy An | 11 | view |
- The time people devote to the job leaves very little time for personal life How widespread is the problem What problem will this shortage of time cause 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 93
- Some people think that uniform at school is unnecessary and should be done away with while others disagree stating its benefits in helping to dissuade discrimination and division based on attire in an educational environment Discuss both viewpoints and gi 95
- Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work but the quality of work only To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- Petroleum is the dominant fuel source for various vehicles nowadays Therefore a rise in its price is often suggested to reduce the growing number of conveyances on the road However although such intervention can have some effect on the problem in my opini 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, then, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30859375 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83407254019 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5225407225 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0575115850754 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297485220169 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283626669086 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470021928349 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283921401738 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.