People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
Nowadays, it is observed that individuals are inclined to opt for beverages which contain a huge amount of sugar. There are some factors attributed as the causes of this propensity and from my perspective, some ideal measures need to be practiced in order to deter people from consuming sugar-based drinks excessively.
On the one hand, experts have put forth some causes contributing to the prevalence of this proclivity. Firstly, the taste and smell of these beverages are appealing to humans. For example, in Vietnam, numerous children tend to drink a great amount of sugar-based drinks like Coca Cola or Pepsi in light of their sweet taste. Consequently, the prolonged consumption of these drinks could render people more susceptible to some illnesses such as diabetes or obesity. Furthermore, drinking beverages containing sugar could help individuals sufficient in energy to continue working. This is because these drinks supplement enough sugar for humans’ bodies to function and make them stay awake. Therefore, not only might sugar-based drinks help people to devote their focus to their projects and work more productively but also assist them in lightening their tension and fatigue.
On the other hand, there are some viable approaches that ought to be taken into account to incentivize people to cut down the consumption of sugar-based beverages. The first method is that authorities should impose higher taxes on these drinks owing to the fact that individuals do not want to lavish money on purchasing these products. Thus, in order to save up a great amount of money, people tend to choose other types of beverages such as coffee or tea, which are much healthier than drinks containing too much sugar. Moreover, governments also need to promulgate the injurious influences of sugary beverages on the health of consumers. This could be perfectly exemplified by the fact that Ho Chi Minh’s authorities have initiated programs relating to the risks of sugar-based drinks. It may lead to the fact that the proportion of people buying these beverages has plummeted.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that some factors have encouraged people to consume too much sugary drinks, which could exert deleterious impacts on their health; nevertheless, there are some feasible ways that could be done to yield the best outcomes in terms of reducing the consumption of these beverages. Additionally, from my viewpoint, it is desirable for consumers to drink a moderate amount of sugar-based drinks to avoid contracting sicknesses associated with sugar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 61
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your op 89
- The percentage of 3 types of crimes car theft house burglary street robbery in England Wales from 1970 to 2015 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33660933661 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93139031147 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525798525799 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8715779086 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.764705882 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359247398215 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10767134926 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719132088904 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22610086792 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505414656794 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.