The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
"The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The given claim recommends that the illegal immigrants pose threat to the country and so every effort must be made to send such immigrants oust the country. However, this claim is based on various assumption made without any detailed information. Such vague arguments cannot be relied upon and further information and evidences are required to conclude on the matter. Furhter in the following paragraphs, I will be explaining the assumptions made by the arguments of the author and the implications applicable if such assumptions prove to be unwarranted.
Firstly, the auther claims that the autonomy of the country is based on its borders strength. The author makes an assumption that the autonomy of a country is solely based on the strenght of the borders. This assumption shall not always hold true, as the autonomy of the country can be based on various other factors like the economic and social performance of a country as compared on the global scale. For example, India, being surrounded by rival country places a significant focus on the border safety, however it is not the only focus. The autonomy of India, is based on the constitution of India, the rules drafted and the regulations laid on its citizens. The self reliace of the country and other such factors. Without the evidence of such factors we cannot conclued on the assumption made by the author. If on proving that the assumption of autonomy are dependent solely on border strength proves to be wrong, it shall have an effect to demilosh the entire working of the country.
Second, the author says that, if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, its economic and national identity are endangered. This is an assumption made without evidence. It is a high possibility that illigal immigrants may pose threat to the countries identity, but it cannot be concluded without obtaining an evidence on the type of immigrants. For instance, a illigal immigrant may have a positive intent, or a group of immigrants may enter the country only as they wanted to escape their own nation, as we see today the situation of Iran, in this circumstances, it would be damage the mental capacity of such immigrants and infact harm them. It is also a possibility to consider that such immigrant if treated well would prove to be of great resource to the nation. So such assumption shall not be made without the evidence of the background of the immigrants entering the country illicitly.
Also, the authour finally recommends that such illigal immigrants entering the country shall be sent back to their country of origin. If we continue the above example, considering a citizen of Iran, a woman, who has sucessfull escaped from her home country and entered the neighbouring country to protect herself, sending her back to her home country would only mean sending her back in pain. All her efforts shall all go in vein. She should rather be treated as refugee and safeguarded by the neighbouring country. Thus such recommendation lacks evidence and needs to be evaluated before implimenting.
In conclusion, I believe that not all illigal immigrants seek to endanger the country's identity and that the autonomy of the country shall not just depend on the strenght of the borders. Evaluatin of the inner workings of the country than worrying about the border safety shall be alleviated. However, considerable eye must be kept for any threats to the country by holding the border security tight and at the same time the working on the economic growth and well being must be taken care of.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | Kaira | 48 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Gnyana | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | aiswaryae | 50 | view |
- Educators should base their assessment of students learning not on students grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas trends and concepts that those facts illustrate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 66
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 54
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have filed a 68
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing an 66
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 13 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 600 350
No. of Characters: 2916 1500
No. of Different Words: 249 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.949 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.86 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.692 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 221 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 175 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 105 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.852 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.15 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssumption that the autonomy of a country is solely based on the strenght of the b...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ligal immigrants may pose threat to the countries identity, but it cannot be concluded wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n the type of immigrants. For instance, a illigal immigrant may have a positive i...
^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... we see today the situation of Iran, in this circumstances, it would be damage the m...
^^^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: IN_VEIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in vain' (=unsuccessfully)?
Suggestion: in vain
...k in pain. All her efforts shall all go in vein. She should rather be treated as refuge...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 517, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...afeguarded by the neighbouring country. Thus such recommendation lacks evidence and...
^^^^
Line 7, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Thus such recommendation lacks evidence and needs to be evaluated before implime...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.9520958084 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 28.8173652695 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 55.5748502994 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2983.0 2260.96107784 132% => OK
No of words: 600.0 441.139720559 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97166666667 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.56307096286 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76622034553 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 204.123752495 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421666666667 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 936.0 705.55239521 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8564247871 57.8364921388 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.730769231 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88461538462 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387043286576 0.218282227539 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120541257749 0.0743258471296 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789143110307 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226494128881 0.128457276422 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539142107597 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 98.500998004 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.