The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009

Essay topics:

The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.

* the table show the percentage of students who were attending four different srcondary education systems at three different years.

Overall, and as we can recognize from the table, there was a stade increase in demond to join the community school, while there was a raghly decrease in demond for the othere three education systems.

Firsly, in 2000 there was a huge percentage of students who prefered to choose a voluntary-controlled school, by 52% of the total of students. On the othere hand the studens who liked to enroll in the specialist and community schools were the lesser in the schools types, by 12% of studens for each of them.

At the end of the period and by 2009 the community school demonstrated on the highst percentage of studens who pickied it by 58% of the students, however specialist school nearly stayed on the same level of demond by 10% of students, for the othere two types of schools, they had a dawnward demond untill they reached 12% of students for grammar school and 20% of students for voluntary-controlled school.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-27 tata 67 view
2023-07-27 tata 73 view
2023-07-27 tata view
2023-07-27 tata 61 view
2023-07-27 tata 73 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of students who prefered to choose a voluntary-controlled school, by 52% of t...
^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...highst percentage of studens who pickied it by 58% of the students, however speci...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90502793296 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98475550625 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.363898899 43.030603864 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.6 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130614180891 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704845648832 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269288524394 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076276191902 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315384189107 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.