Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child's success at school. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In today's modern society, there needs a lot of factors for children's success in academic settings. There is a big statement that classmates influence more than parents a child to be successful at school. From my point of view, I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, there are two major reasons that show that parents having an impact on their children. First, parents are the first educators in a child's life. Parents provide guidance, support and create a learning environment at home, which helps children comfortable enough to learn. Besides, they also have abilities to satisfy their children's needs. They can sacrifice everything to give children the best education that helps they have more chances to be successful in the future. Second, parents are the source of encouragement and motivation. They are the ones who know the importance of education and set expectations for their children's academic performance. Parents frequently create a conducive environment at home. They assist their children with their homework and engage in discussions about school topics, which helps children be more interested in studying and want to widen their knowledge about different topics. In short, parents can boost a child's motivation significantly and drive them to succeed.
On the other hand, classmates are as important as parents for two rationales. To begin with, classmates are understandable people. They and the children are the same age, so they are likely to understand each other thoroughly. Besides, they assist each other to solve their problems easily. At their age, they have various sensitive secrets, which can not talk about with their parents; however, they can share them with their classmates without worrying so that they can work out suitable solutions. For this reason, they can teach each other soft skills which help them deal with certain situations, that parents do not educate at home. In addition, classmates create a competitive studying environment. When receive the results of exams, children see their classmates have to better results than them, they will be motivated to study harder. That helps build up a positive academic setting.
In conclusion, I party agree with the statement that classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child's success at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | mchau | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | maomatmeo23 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | maomatmeo23 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | thaotrinh2989 | view | |
| 2023-08-02 | XunHai | 56 | view |
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors Do you agree or disagree with this statement Wri 84
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors Do you agree or disagree with this statement Wri 56
- Some people think that boys and girls should be educated in the same school Others however believe that girls achieve better results when educated in single sex schools Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success at school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- It s very important that children should study hard at school Time spent studying on the Internet is time wasted Do you agree or disagree State the reasons for your answer 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in short, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28032345013 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73993427815 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1607306589 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1739130435 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1304347826 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322696603799 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11684247791 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164403853108 0.0667982634062 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357406779406 0.151304729494 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.230142538585 0.056905535591 404% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in short, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28032345013 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73993427815 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1607306589 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1739130435 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1304347826 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322696603799 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11684247791 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164403853108 0.0667982634062 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357406779406 0.151304729494 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.230142538585 0.056905535591 404% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.