The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generation for modern life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is believed that traditional principles such as moral and value cultivated by elderlies may assist young generation to face the era of society 5.0. However, others claim those hardly support the contemporary youth. I, personally, consent to positive reasons from this tropical issue which I will elucidate more below.
To begin with, one of deeply rooted perspectives is the type of work-from-office which can be signs of career stagnation in today’s society. Oldsters frequently judge individuals as jobless due to only staying at home. Consequently, if ones earn amount of dollars, neighbours will inflict social gossip by assuming mystical power behind the success. Moreover, the tendency of misogyny arouse unbalance role between women and men in every aspect. In connection with patriarchal culture, many ladies receive gender discrimination such as lack of education access and equal salary, pictured by South Korean women, eventually initiating feminist movement called “Four No’s” to bring justice.
On the other hand, one of traditional characteristics which should be adopted by young generation is hard-working tenet. Instead of wasting time in retirement age. they are more likely keeping their productivity with taking secondary job such as taxi driver or gardener. Furthermore, having been handled by oldsters can maintain large proportion of loyalty, a ten-year dedication, resulting in greater company performance. Reported by labours statistic, such group prefers retaining their companies during several times to submitting other job fields.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, traditional and moral values which are hold by older generation greatly assist young generation. They should adopt hard-working and loyal principles of life to adapt this current era. This is as long as such ideas should adjust to any changes of modern life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | yeesn | 81 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Nguyen051207 | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | Ngoc21 | 78 | view |
- In recent times economic growth has helped many become richer both in developed and developing countries However those in developed countries are not as happy as they were in the past Why is this What can be learned from this 89
- In modern times some species of animals are slowly disappearing Do you think that it is acceptable for species to become extinct What are the possible reasons and consequences of this extinction Provise reasons and examples to explain your opinion 61
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...tead of wasting time in retirement age. they are more likely keeping their productiv...
^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'labours'' or 'labour's'?
Suggestion: labours'; labour's
...reater company performance. Reported by labours statistic, such group prefers retaining...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66548042705 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99822856056 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.715302491103 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2750318273 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972987550303 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317528527 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464295712241 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664388702895 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587581687306 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.