"Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.l differences in Man and Woman tasks are not equally suited for both
The editor of the aeronautics magazine states that manned spaced flight is costlier and more dangerous and thus we should invest more in unmanned space satellites and probes to gather information. This claim seems coherent and well intended in first glance.
The difference that can be noted are "manned flights" and "unmaned probes and satellites". Space flights and space probes and satellites are two different terms and have their own advantages and disadvantages which have not been eloborated or explained in the statement. The difference also lies in the terms of their sizes and as mentioned the cost and danger associated with them. The lack of exact details of how or in what terms exactly the cost differs for both makes it look skeptical.
There is always going to be a difference in the success rate and the type of information gather by each of the space exploration machine. The success rate has not been give to prove the reliablity of the space probes and satellites comapred to a human driven space flight. While the satellite can provide us with pictures or the temperture variation data, there is much more information that is required for a space research. There may be certain aspects of it which can only be understood by actually experiencing them.
It also mention the risks associated with sending human into the space, which are undeniable but since space research and launching satellites itself is quite a risking task, I dont think researchers or astrounauts are afraid of these challenges. The possiblities of miscalculations for each should also be noted. Since a manned satellite has a human life which is at stake requires to be more cautious and careful as the there are no major repurcursions to an unmanned satellite.
Thus a detailed report of the astounaunts who have previously ventured into the space should be taken and their opinions should be taken before coming to a conclusion. Also a comaprison consisting of the resources required, cost, development time, the type of information collected by such satellites previuosly and the risks associated should be all considered as a factor before taking a judgement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 54
- Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain h 16
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 356 350
No. of Characters: 1772 1500
No. of Different Words: 179 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.344 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.978 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.819 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.733 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.346 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.332 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.598 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'space research'.
Suggestion: space research
...h more information that is required for a space research. There may be certain aspects of it whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mentions'?
Suggestion: mentions
...by actually experiencing them. It also mention the risks associated with sending human...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lites itself is quite a risking task, I dont think researchers or astrounauts are af...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...epurcursions to an unmanned satellite. Thus a detailed report of the astounaunts wh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...be taken before coming to a conclusion. Also a comaprison consisting of the resource...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 11.1786427146 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 356.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12640449438 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00054044494 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51404494382 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2188771855 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.70786347227 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374254372491 0.218282227539 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121323077285 0.0743258471296 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661767818878 0.0701772020484 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206190582506 0.128457276422 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462106718863 0.0628817314937 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.