Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced. They only care about how much it costs.
How true is this statement? What influences people when they buy food?
In contemporary society, it is generally believed that instead of worrying about the procedures to produce food, people only pay attention to their price. Personally, I totally concur with this statement and the following paper will provide analysis on my viewpoint as well as outlining factors that impact buying decisions of food shoppers.
The first reason why consumers are more prone to price consideration rather than quality check when it comes to buying food is that there are some families suffering from financial burdens. To exemplify, after the covid-19 pandemic, many nations have fallen in economic downturn which means that it might be necessary for citizens to calculate every expenditure. As a result, those who are in the case of financial crisis tend to make a first look at the cost to have the minimum spending on food because there could be more important costs of living to care about. The second driver for the act of being not interested in food production is about not having enough time. Take white-collar workers as an example. These people may spend half of their day being at the offices to work industriously on tons of tasks assigned. Therefore, they have no choice but to get foods on the streets to fill their stomach or place an order from delivery services and apparently, reviewing the nutrition contents or the ingredient table is not their priorities.
Apart from the price of food, there are still others contributors influencing food buyers. The first factor to be mentioned is advertisement. This is because there are many promotions broadcasting products with vivid and fascinating designs making some foods more desirable than others. Hence, a large number of viewers who are drawn to this might be persuaded to put those items in their cart. Secondly, food origin is another concerning factor in addition to price. For example, in Vietnam, especially young generation, they have a tendency to consume foods originating from foreign countries such as Western or European nations to diversify their food consumption options. Thus, payment seems not to be these individuals’ thoughts but the demand to try various tastes, which is trendy in the lifestyle of modern people.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that due to being affected by the decrease of the economy along with having less time to learn more about the ways food is produced, price is the most notable feature for customers to care about. However, advertisements and food origin are the other attributes when it comes to food purchasing in addition to price.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | xxlusubuxx | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | nguyen thanh sang | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-25 | cheetah__123 | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | khoapham | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | nhattram39 | 61 | view |
- the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country between 1979 and 2004 84
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 84
- the world s population has been increasing significantly and people are running out of water food and fuel What consequences may overpopulation lead to What measures can be taken to fight overpopulation 84
- Some people think that climate change has a negative impact on business while others think it provides more business opportunities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- the graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act buying decisions of food shoppers. The first reason why consumers are more ...
^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...oods more desirable than others. Hence, a large number of viewers who are drawn to this might be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ways'' or 'way's'?
Suggestion: ways'; way's
...aving less time to learn more about the ways food is produced, price is the most not...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13647058824 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78910386074 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1296952172 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.277777778 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6111111111 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263450214947 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794361473632 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540224979207 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170851580474 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021487221252 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act buying decisions of food shoppers. The first reason why consumers are more ...
^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...oods more desirable than others. Hence, a large number of viewers who are drawn to this might be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ways'' or 'way's'?
Suggestion: ways'; way's
...aving less time to learn more about the ways food is produced, price is the most not...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13647058824 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78910386074 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1296952172 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.277777778 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6111111111 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263450214947 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794361473632 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540224979207 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170851580474 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021487221252 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.