Some people think news has no connection to people’s lives. Therefore, it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that there are no relation between news and human life. As a result, spending time on reading newspaper or watching TV news chanels is not neccessary. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this idea.
On the one hand, news related to numerous aspects of human life. To commence with, news provides individuals with information about local, national and global events. This awareness is essential for making informed decisions, staying update on current affairs and understanding about the world around us. Moreover, emergencies, natuaral disasters or public safety concerns also is reported on news. This information can be crucial for people’s safety, especially people living in the areas that are affected extremely by these concerns, allowing them to take appropriate actions in times of crisis.
On the other hand, spending time on reading newspapers and watching TV news programs also have positive effects on people. Initially, newspapers serve as a source of educational and knowledge. It helps individuals learn about different cultures, societies, historical events,... which contribute to personal growth and a broaden perspective. Not only that, reading newspapers also affects to language development effectively due to the words and sentence structures. In fact, people can learn another language faster if they read news in the language they want to learn regularly. Moreover, while TV news chanels primarily serve as an informative purpose, many people also find it entertaining. Some news programs include haman interest stories or lighter segments that provide entertainment and a break from more serious news.
In conclusion, news has a great connection to people’s lives, therefore, I totally disagree that reading newspapers or watching news programs is a waste of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-12 | Anhhhhhh | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Anhhhhhh | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | kienbanhkem | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are solutions for these problems 84
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...t cultures, societies, historical events,... which contribute to personal growth a...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...which contribute to personal growth and a broaden perspective. Not only that, reading new...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57553956835 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9289500699 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5726286297 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1764705882 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379815984536 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115953606018 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115047115144 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286134294363 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121178458673 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.