Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather
than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which
adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how
these examples shape your position.
In an ideal situation it is true that precaution is always better than cure and hence one would seem to prefer avoiding the foreseeable problem but in a practical view I strongly feel that the government should focus solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of tommorow. Countries as of now are always tackling and ridden with monsters in the form of hunger, poverty, unemployment, poor health facilities and manymore and hence they should focus more on these existing problems rather than worrying about some unforeseen activity.
Any country when ranked in terms of development is always questioned regarding the problems it is currently facing. Poverty index, hunger index etc were all created so as to make sure countries are focussed on their path of development. It is the job of the government to ensure this.
Firstly, playing the game of probablity and allocating funds and resources for an event which has not occured yet might backfire since people are already suffering from the existing problems. It is important to justify the usage of these resources since the entire idea of the government is to ensure that the people are happy and if not they shall not be elected for the next tenure. One can think of the military expenditure as an example. It is true that a country must work for its defenses anticiapting a future war, however in the 21st century we are all aware of its devastations and hence war is almost out of question. Certain countires like Canada have no military itself and are allocating its entire funds to health care and to erradicate poverty and are performing very well
We can also think about the investments made by US in afghanistan, Iran etc. to make sure that in future there is no dictatorship,threat of nuclear weapons and a proper democracy there but its own country revolted against the decision since people were not satiated with the extreme budget being used for making sure that such future threats which might and might not happen. There are larger problems like unemployment, worsening climatic conditions, homelessness and inflation which needs much more focus there currently.
Further it should be kept in mind that something which is being anticipated by someone might not even be the prime concern of the others. The judgement of how good a government is performing lies in the hands of people and if something is being anticipated by the whole country, it no longer is a problem of future. Every government has a fixed tenure and it should more likely focus on problems which the people are struggling with currently since thats the whole notion behind choosing a government is to deal with those problems.
Again iterating and still not denying that precaution is always better than cure but curing the existing problems always takes priority. Thus with the above examples and points I would like to conclude that if the anticipations are right, the problem is no longer of the future and will have to be tackled and is understood by the people. Moreover, we can always hold a justified set of resources for any unforeseen situations. Thus the key to a great government is the right allocation and emphasis on the right problems making sure that they justify their decision and to the people who elected them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 83
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ndex, hunger index etc were all created so as to make sure countries are focussed on the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , threat
... that in future there is no dictatorship,threat of nuclear weapons and a proper democra...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ple are struggling with currently since thats the whole notion behind choosing a gove...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...xisting problems always takes priority. Thus with the above examples and points I wo...
^^^^
Line 6, column 428, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...esources for any unforeseen situations. Thus the key to a great government is the ri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, well, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2764.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 562.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91814946619 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70639808984 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464412811388 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 875.7 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.2184666495 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.473684211 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5789473684 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261232524671 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750886391622 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810136397031 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13522264106 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963792377692 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.