Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
With technological advances human beings have been able to decipher various unknowns, yet in the process debunking some beilefs which are often entrenched in our minds. Though the everchanging nature of arguments, often beileved as universal truths, these pieces of infomation unless refuted in near future gives people a scense of understanding in the vast confusing world, thus I believe that these informations should not be given up in the hopes of it being inccurate in ner future, while I agree that keeping a healthy amount of specticism is often a necessicity. Similar beilefs are futher explored in the impending paragraphs.
Firstly, as of now human beings haven't been able to predict accurately what the future holds, so unpredictability is an unrefutable property of the future. Amids this uncertainity, every trivial matter if viewed under the lens of speckticism, it only tourments people, while acceptance leads to peace. Taking as an example, nearly 1000 years ago, people beileved that earth was the central mass of the universe, around which sun, moon and other planets revolved, which might sound ootlanding now, conferred with the simplistic beilef based on what was perceptible. Though the advances in space eploration have been made, these debunked therories made the people feel someting constancy with their world, helping them to adapt in the vast sea of uncertainity. And if some new theories emerge tomorrow, the current beilefs still have held their part of keeping people content.
In the meantime, innovation cannot thrive where there is dogmatism, so having an healthy amount mistrust is essential for growth. The can be said to many scientist working on radical theories, which at present sounds fanciful, which one day might be regarded common-sense or even universal truths. If Charles Darwing held on with the beief that god creates men, and everything living and non-living, we wouldn't be able to undestand the vast evolutionary trends of the worldm which has even influenced various streams of studies.
Thus, taking everything in retrsopect I beieve that acceptance of things helps harbor peace and keep humans contempt, rather bombarding themselved with plethora of question engendered by skecpticism, though such informations may be refuted in near future but having a little mistrust over the orthodox beilef is necessary for everyone to harbor a innovation and imagination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 66
- The graph below shows the Qatari and Omani import totals in tonnes for several types of vegetables Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 20
- In some countries today people are having their first child when they are older What are the reasons for this Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are become more isolated Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...phs. Firstly, as of now human beings havent been able to predict accurately what th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t. In the meantime, innovation cannot thrive where there is dogmatism, so havi...
^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ive where there is dogmatism, so having an healthy amount mistrust is essential fo...
^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...nd everything living and non-living, we wouldnt be able to undestand the vast evolution...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lef is necessary for everyone to harbor a innovation and imagination.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36482939633 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85827374195 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619422572178 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.8046429098 60.3974514979 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.333333333 118.986275619 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187903199025 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615893296024 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522588158073 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119395529956 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347268530141 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.