Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are
unclear.
The concept of funding is always troubling and a point of worry for scientists, whether it is from a private organization or by the government, the pressure remains the
same. While it is true that, from understanding a simple concept of resistance in electrical conductance or a breakthrough like the faraday's laws the world has witnessed
some wonder which took them us by surprise. However, all of them were accidents and not properly funded research, which by logic or common sense, should have an objective
to complete, or a theory to prove or disprove, or development of a new technology. Research is always done with pre-determined results in mind. I will put forth my
views on the prerequisite of funding by the government for scientific research in this essay.
Research is a way to prove an initial idea, every research has its own purpose and objective, a team of great minds coming together to achieve or attempt to solve
mysteries that no one could till now. The idea of research is always to achieve a target or to innovate, this target can be as simple as to prove a statement like
ohms law, or to study the effects of a substance or naturally occurring phenomena on other beings or on itself, for example, the eruption of a volcano, on the other hand, it
can be as complex as the idea to develop a quantum computer.
The idea of just putting money into something without knowing the benefits it will reap sounds rubbish, one would never invest or donate money in anything if the use of the
money is not justified. The same goes for the government when choosing the research to fund, always the deciding factor is the quality and the potential the result of the research,
if successful, possesses.
Conversely, people generally confuse research with accidental discoveries, the innovation of electro-magnetic applications was a result of an accident which was
followed by proper research on the idea whose source was the accident but even in this case too the research had an aim. Some might say that these strict proposal
guidelines will eventually demoralize fellow scientists to even come up, fearing rejection and the world would lose some very good ideas. Nothing can be further from
the truth, if anyone has a purpose to research then there should also be known consequences.
It sum it up, no research will turn fruitful until an aim is agreed upon. Without aim, research is just people with technical knowledge hitting shots in the dark,
hoping to hit a bull's eye and no one not even the government should bear the loss of such profligate consumers of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | georgez | 58 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 66
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 62
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel
- Some people think that we learn best through in person interaction with a teacher in a classroom Others believe that online learning is more effective Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...ding is always troubling and a point of worry for scientists, whether it is from a privat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the government, the pressure remains the same. While it is true that, from unders...
^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he faradays laws the world has witnessed some wonder which took them us by surpri...
^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned results in mind. I will put forth my views on the prerequisite of funding by ...
^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... together to achieve or attempt to solve mysteries that no one could till now. Th...
^^^
Line 8, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e as simple as to prove a statement like ohms law, or to study the effects of a s...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ohms'' or 'ohm's'?
Suggestion: ohms'; ohm's
...s simple as to prove a statement like ohms law, or to study the effects of a subst...
^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion of a volcano, on the other hand, it can be as complex as the idea to develop...
^^^
Line 12, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nate money in anything if the use of the money is not justified. The same goes fo...
^^^
Line 13, column 25, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he use of the money is not justified. The same goes for the government when choos...
^^^
Line 13, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he potential the result of the research, if successful, possesses. Conversely...
^^^
Line 16, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns was a result of an accident which was followed by proper research on the idea ...
^^^
Line 17, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome might say that these strict proposal guidelines will eventually demoralize fe...
^^^
Line 18, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... good ideas. Nothing can be further from the truth, if anyone has a purpose to re...
^^^
Line 21, column 4, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sums'?
Suggestion: sums
...hould also be known consequences. It sum it up, no research will turn fruitful u...
^^^
Line 21, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal knowledge hitting shots in the dark, hoping to hit a bulls eye and no one not...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, so, then, while, as to, for example, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88314606742 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81015166939 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537078651685 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9503395755 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.214285714 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7857142857 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.97078651685 362% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214195394142 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077732501454 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661814876455 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679032999746 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746486512508 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.