Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree? You should write at least 250 words.
Several statements argued that financial underpinning is not a solitary method to support the less developing nations because it could not cope with the impoverishment comprehensively. Following my personality, I strongly agree with this perspective and will give an explanation in this below essay.
To begin with, financial support could not resolve the destitution phenomenon completely if these undeveloped countries do not know related to the difficulty of financial distribution between their domestic regions. Imagine, a poor country was received an enormous amount of money from a rich country. This country's government only concentrated on how to ameliorate financial issues and infrastructure in the central metropolitan, try to attract international investing capital that was allocated a tiny part of the sum for less-developing areas. It could lead to not only the unbalance between domestic economic regions but also non-development throughout the nation, therefore, it might not deal with poverty in several areas absolutely.
Moreover, when a developed country provides cutting-edge subjects such as technologies, innovations, and education for poor countries, especially, investing in several less-efficient financial regions, it could facilitate an equal chance for everyone from various domestic regions can access to modern items. For example, if the children who lived in the mountainous area, access educational and medical services, it would help them to assimilate knowledge, and make sure their health. In the future, these children could play an important role in contributing to drastic workforce for nations, assist in improving economic and social scales, and get rid of poverty sustainably.
In conclusion, developed countries should provide not only financial aid but also other supported items based on the potential finance of poor countries in order to equate and debase the discrepancy between the developing and impoverished areas, from that, it can handle the poverty for these nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the class size of four states of Australia 73
- Some people say that young people should be encouraged to leave home when they become adults while others claim it is better if they remain with their family Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Research indicates that we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experience we have in our life which do you consider to be the major influence 78
- Overfishing is a serious global problem that threatens ocean wildlife and biodiversity Loss of marine life brings a further threat to the millions of people who rely on seafood for protein and livelihoods 84
- The demand for online coaching services and video courses has grown significantly in the digital age Some now feel this method of learning is a superior option to in person learning To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77926421405 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26051794691 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5239957348 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.8 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218452124459 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864648933655 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711559774093 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139506613463 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774796415565 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.84 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.