The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to our advancing technological prowess in recent decades, numerous aspects of our lives have become subjects of alterations, of which our traditional education system is no exception, and its retirement is expected by many soon. In my opinion, while this argument is not without merits, such transitions may be yet to come in such a short span as 2050 for the following reasons.
There exist valid rationales behind the belief in the outdatedness of our current academic landscape. To begin with, the rapid development of many of our technologies has provided a variety of edges over the classic teaching circumstance, the most notable being the surgent of online education with its accessibility and flexibility. Such features equip learners with better control over their progress, from pacing to location, allowing adjustments to cater to their needs. Moreover, a multitude of hurdles and limitations traditional classrooms may face are avoidable for online schooling. To illustrate, teaching activities in prior years had come to a halt because of the effect of the pandemic, for which online classrooms have proven to be a reliable replacement.
Nevertheless, the decline of the typical learning environment is anything but imminent. First and foremost, online education, the premier alternative to conventional schooling, is still riddled with concerns among the public. Online classrooms fail to provide face-to-face engagement between teachers and students, as learners and faculties alike face restrictions in their interactions. This proves to be a major drawback, as pupils cannot get sufficient support and attention to their studies, as well as missing out on developing vital skills such as cooperation and teamwork. Additionally, online education may not be suitable for all subjects, as it requires a certain level of self-discipline and motivation from students to ensure rigorous standards and effectiveness as traditional classrooms.
In conclusion, while online education may have its advantages, the traditional classroom setting remains a crucial and irreplaceable aspect of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-24 | Roy An | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | moledro | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | Sprios_D | 78 | view |
- Although more and more people read the news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspaper will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people Do you agree or disagree 89
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66981132075 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26692632946 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5920941968 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.692307692 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0533704673585 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199541359143 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207170448285 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0272857009133 0.151304729494 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199555133548 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.