Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility.
Environmental degradation is considered a pressing issue in many nations. In this essay, I will first outline the factors leading to the damged environment before suggesting that both individuals and the governments should be responsible for it.
The polluted and contaminated environment is first to blame for a lack of hightened awareness among citizens. To explain, many human activities such as littering, illegal logging, or forest burning has adversly affected our greenery environment, rendering it even more vulnerable to damge. Another contributor that cannot be overlooked is that governments have yet to impose environmetal laws and regulations that are stringent enough, restrecting properly the impacts of human activities on the environment. In light of this, many factories, for instance, have continued to dump industry and manufacturing rubbish into the rivers, contributing to the vulnerability of the environment.
In an attempt to address such an issue, concerted efforts and actions from both normal citizens and the governments are required. On a governmental level, the onus should be placed on the states to mount more environment-related campaigns to raise people’s awareness about the detrimental impacts of not protecting our green living conditions. For example, The Green World (TGW) run by the UK government has been reported to successfully reduce the amount of waste around the world, contributing significantly to a greener living condition. However, with only governments’ efforts and without each person’s cooperation, such campaigns would have negligible impacts or even be rendered futile. If individuals and governments join hands, protecting the environment will be more effective.
In conclusion, environmental deterioration can be ascribed to two primary factors: people’s awareness and laws that are not stringent enough. However, there exist both parties joining hands to tackle it: the onus to organize more campaignes and the responsibily to collaborate along with the governments to gain better preservation results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 89
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarize the information by selecting and report 84
- Some people say that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games Others say that young people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to individuals and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree and disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38239907289 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3802824175 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0909548200156 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035302592474 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351468350743 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665816550068 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485512575148 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.