In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Essay topics:

In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?

One of the most contentious issues today relates to how people consume cashless materials and the impact of it on the society. In this essay, I will provide the disadvantages and advantages of this phenomenon.

To begin with, I feel strongly agree that cashless society brings convenience to people. The reason for this is that conventional pocket which we tend to forget at home or even get stolen will not be needed anymore. In addition, transaction will happen more easily because we are no longer needed to exchange unnecessary cash and coins. For example, cashless society has been introduced in Australia for while ago and it has significantly improved the country's economy.

On the other hand, security seems to be the most alarming concern in cashless society. I often argue that in fact credit cards are more easily to be stolen or hacked by hackers because the digital transaction is not protected by police. Furthermore, due to the lack of proper law, cashless is prone to be unsafe. For example, according the last survey, there was approximately 90% of the online transactions have been hacked and exploited because of the vulnerability of the cashless system.

In conclusion, cashless society is proven to be accepted in our modern society. It has now been shown that the convenience of cashless provides us a fast transaction, but its security should be monitored carefully. It is expected that there will be a law for online and cashless transaction in the future in order to fully protect the consumers.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02362204724 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88483563562 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1461921212 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1538461538 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226562489328 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867063438555 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474511733605 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14403504024 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239432905062 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.