The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? (72)
Wildlife activism has got increased attention from 1970. Since then numerous zoos and safari parks opened at many parts of the world. This essay will discuss the wellbeing of animals in zoos.
Despite all efforts to plant more greenery and make it look more natural, it is impossible to match the life of an animal in the zoo to its life in a natural habitat like a forest. Animals can live freely only in forests, not in a fenced area. For example, the sheer amount of plastic waste that visitors leave in the zoo make it unfit for wildlife. So life in a zoo is miserable for animals.
Animals are often fed with processed food in zoo diet. This will not only leave animals underfed but also affect their natural instincts. Studies show that the average lifespan of exhibits of zoos in developed countries in ten years shorter than the animals living in forests. It is clear that zoo inhabited animals eventually lose all their immunity and die prematurely.
This essay discussed how life in a zoo is a misery for animals and how bad zoo is for the general wellbeing of animals. In conclusion, zoos are not a good option for protecting rights of animals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 1207.87684729 80% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66504854369 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41913714501 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577669902913 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 379.143842365 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7550498209 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9230769231 104.977214359 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8461538462 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21751221092 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839681365291 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366329607207 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13715253329 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322754797774 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 12.6369458128 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.5310837438 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.