Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can lead to antisocial behavior, can team sports really be good for us.
Sports contribute for building a person's body and also mind. Sports give a great opportunity for youth to bring up their skill of managing, motivating and driving highly versatile teams towards one common vision. If every player starts looking at sports as an opportunity to grow as a human and not as a race to compete and win, they will find themselves as capable individuals to deal with any good or bad situation, they encounter in life. Due to enormous pressure brought by trainers and countries, players forget the actual value of being sportive and try to apply any strategy (violent or unruly) to win. In conclusion, I feel there are several good or bad scopes offered by any task which come in our way. It is up to the human to make a choice of which path they adopt, depending on situations they encounter. Same applies to training institutes or governments who promote sports. Depending on the values adopted by top nationals, the players manage their road-map to ultimate goals of winning or loosing. If being ethical is adopted in the country, the players choose moral ways of winning games. On the contrary, if the nation chooses only to win by all means, players can adopt any immoral ways to win.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, i feel, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 1207.87684729 83% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71226415094 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5600782281 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646226415094 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 379.143842365 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3211369263 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967480437227 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407631993344 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424767608773 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967480437227 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.5310837438 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.