Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different countries. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
The past 50 years have seen a considerable increase in global tourism. Despite undeniable benefits it has brought about, I firmly believe that its drawbacks would eclipse.
It is often argued that travelling would widen traveler’s horizon but whether a short period of holiday-time could make sense has not been proven. I would argue that the insufficiency of a full and proper analysis of something could lead to severe misunderstanding between people from different countries. For example, a tourist spending only one week on holiday in the Middle East region could mistakenly concede that the veiling of women there is strictly regulated and relate it to gender discrimination.
Despite the irrefutable economic prosperity host countries could obtain, the influx of foreign holiday-makers often associate with negative aspects of their culture. This is because developing countries such as Vietnam and Thailand would be the favorite playgrounds of tourists from more affluent ones, which tends to export iconic problems such as prostitution, alcoholism as well as drug abuse. Therefore, if countries playing as hosts do not take enough preventative measures, their own culture will suffer from the risk of moral decadence. Even more disturbing is the environmental degradation that international tourism has caused to many parts of the world as the countless of garbage are dumped directly into the ocean on a yearly basis.
Granted, international tourism is of paramount importance in fostering understanding and tolerance among countries. However, this assumption still lies in theory while the tension it creates is hardly arguable.
By way of conclusion, the challenges presented by booming global holiday are numerous and complex, most serious among which are misunderstanding and evil problems involved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | 2xhptaljahy | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular.Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.What are your opinions in this? 84
- Some people think all lawbreakers should be put into prison, while others believethat there are better alternatives. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 73
- The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children's sports and participation in different sports in UK from 2008 to 2014. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lieve that its drawbacks would eclipse. It is often argued that travelling would...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60869565217 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14248051464 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677536231884 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1443989619 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158237130036 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554658583903 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671956207599 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776853861657 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665266350372 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.