Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying
Some people believe that universities should adapt stringent policies, which requires the student to take courses only within their own area of study. Other group argues and advocates for implementing the rules for the students to take courses from diversified fields. I believe that students should focus on their respective fields and study courses related to their own filed for few reasons. In the following few paragraphs, I will elaborate my reasoning.
Student life is the seeding time and the success of a man mostly depends on how well he used her student life. During this life, student should focus on the tasks which help him to be ace in their respective field. Because now-a-days of competitive age without specialization, it is very difficult to reach at the acme of any profession. For example, a bio-chemist with well rounded knowledge may able to enter his respective job, but without specialization knowledge, he could not distinguish himself from others and this hinders him to reach at the zenith of his career. Furthermore, during student time the brains of a student remain so sharp that they can easily develop expertise in any field which also last for long.
During student life, student usually faces economic crisis and if they are compelled to take courses from other discipline then it will be burden for them. Being forced to take courses from diversified field, they become financially looser as well as they wastes their valuable time. The time that they spend on taking courses from other discipline can spend on to be expert on their respective field. For example, a medical student requires to take language course and the student have to spend reasonable time to pass the course because it is the mandatory requirement set by the university authority to graduate. To fulfill this requirement student have to spend valuable money as well as valuable time which he can spend to read his major courses. Thus, the requirement of taking courses from diversified field is economically burden as well it is wastage of valuable time of the students.
Though students should develop expertise in their respective field, they should also have knowledge from other area to some extent. For instance, student from any background should have knowledge about what is happening around the world, what is going to be the major changes in world politics etc. These knowledge help a student to be a well-rounded people and the companies also give value to such kind of well-rounded employee.
In conclusion, I agree with the decision of universities, which require the students to take courses only from their respective field. Because the rule of taking courses within their specific area helps the students to save money as well as valuable time. By this policy, student can develop expertise in their respective field which facilitates them to reach at zenith in their profession.
- Government invest in the visual arts the kind you commonly see in art galleries is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 85
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper 73
- The city council of Town x has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in the public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d field, they become financially looser as well as they wastes their valuable time...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'waste'
Suggestion: waste
...come financially looser as well as they wastes their valuable time. The time that they...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...For example, a medical student requires to take language course and the student have to...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'These knowledges'?
Suggestion: This knowledge; These knowledges
...he major changes in world politics etc. These knowledge help a student to be a well-rounded peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to reach at zenith in their profession.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2441.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10669456067 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69704221213 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428870292887 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.994525001 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.238095238 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361829813977 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133875873466 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936401609166 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225665725229 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855052299595 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.