Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The success of a team, a organization or an institution compounds on the effectiveness of the leader- how well the leader is managing his team members, how concomitant his judgement of different circumstances is with the success of the team, how efficiently he handles the problems faced by the team and so on. The passage outlines the fact that leader's ability to maintain the respect of his peers is more significant than sound moral judgement. I oppose to this claim for two reasons.
To begin, lets imagine of a cricket team recently has been going through a terrible form. The team has lost all the matches it played this year. The captain, i.e. the leader, who is respected by the players, not only of his own team but also by the opposing teams, has been recently called into question regarding the decision making- picking out-of-form players for the matches. For example, a certain player, the opening batsman of the team, who is a legend himself in the game, lauded and adored by other players of the team, is currently facing a hard time scoring runs. The leader kept picking him for matches after matches although his form is hurting the team's performance. Now, if the leader drops the player for the match, which is the right and moral thing to do considering the form, he would perhaps get a setback from the other players of the team. But this moral judgement could actually work in favor for the team and the new player might perform well enough to get a good score and help the team to ultimately break the shackles of losing. Thus, a moral judgement turns out to more important than maintaining the respect of the players.
Furthermore, neutral judgement of the leader itself helps to maintain the respect of the peers . The respect for the leader results from the impartiality and unbiasedness of the leader. If a leader is disinterested and moral in his judgement, the decision making will be fair and sound and will perhaps bring more success. Eventually, if the a team or a company or an organization becomes more prosperous, every member will be ebullient, as being more successful is the ultimate goal. Consequently, the leader will be vaunted and will be able to maintain the respect of his peers as well. Therefore, moral judgement itself helps maintain the reverence of the peers. But without the sound judgement the leader might struggle to maintain the veneration of the peers.
However, one might argue that moral judgement might sometimes result in degradation of respect. But, if a decision is sound and right , in the end it will work out for better prosperity. Hence, the respect for the leader ,rather than degrading, would enhance further.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 54
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 62
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
The success of a team, a organization or an institution compound...
^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... on. The passage outlines the fact that leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...atches although his form is hurting the teams performance. Now, if the leader drops t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 983, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...layer might perform well enough to get a good score and help the team to ultimate...
^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lps to maintain the respect of the peers . The respect for the leader results from...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...haps bring more success. Eventually, if the a team or a company or an organization be...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t. But, if a decision is sound and right , in the end it will work out for better ...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...erity. Hence, the respect for the leader ,rather than degrading, would enhance fur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84531590414 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66667333267 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474945533769 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6510826103 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.904761905 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301644270355 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102801559535 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837460824422 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19252408656 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771014790768 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.