Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
With the aid of a multitude of modern technologies, distance learning and working is becoming increasingly ubiquitous among workers and pupils. From a personal point of view, this development is unworthy of support regarding its shortcomings.
First and foremost, working from home can compromise the productivity of workers. With the informal atmosphere of their accommodation, adults are easily distracted from their work by outward interruptions. To exemplify this argument, adults with small children struggle to keep up with their office work as they simultaneously have to deal with the gruelling task of taking care of their offspring. Hence, working from home can potentially do harm to the productivity of white-collar workers.
Another disadvantage of this particular trend is that it stifles the development of young children's social skills. Schools with conventional classroom settings play a central role in promoting interactions and aiding the establishment of relationships among kids. Opting for distance learning blocks this development as children are bound to experience difficulties in making friends, given the limited communication among them. For example, students in America suffer from numerous anxieties when studying online in long periods as they are separated from their peers and teachers. Therefore, studying from home is detrimental to the socialisation of children.
Taking everything into consideration, it is apparent that working and studying from home does more harm than good to adults as well as children. The issues stemming from distance learning and working ought to be addressed and conventional working places and schools remain the optimum choice of the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant In 2010 there were 750 000 visitors residi 73
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 82
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73333333333 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18999782456 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9475753158 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298800564314 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114871650257 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691464456495 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177359577902 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042518049752 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.