It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Teaching children to acknowledge basic distinctions of right and wrong is crucial at their early development stage. While some people claim that punishment is necessary for the process, I personally do not agree with such an idea, since a good teaching method does not necessarily include punishment.
To think that punishment is crucial to teach children basic moral conscience should be considered as a big mistake made by any parents. Children at a young age such as infants would not yet develop the ability to fully understand right and wrong. As a result, punishment, while cannot help much in developing the moral conscience in young children, can have reversed effects such as giving the child psychological scars. Research on strict teaching methods of Asian parents showed that children who had received strict punishment at an early age were more likely to have mental illnesses when they grew up.
Children’s ability to reason would develop over time as they grow up, therefore, a gentle approach would be better to teach children. Instead of punishing children, parents and grown-ups should behave as role models for them to look up to. In that way, children would learn about which action is acceptable and which is not. Adults should also point out the mistakes that children make and guide them to assert their behaviors to better next time.
Sometimes, punishment is unavoidable, but even under such circumstances, parents should not punish their children using strict methods. Instead, they can give the children a firm but fair punishment as a time-out, detention, or withdrawal of privileges. The punishment should also be related to the mistake that children make such as making the child put the trash in the garbage if they drop it out, making the child clean the wall when they doodles, and so on. This would help children realize the consequences of their actions and try to fix their behavior for better next time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 81
- The tables give information about age income and poverty population in 3 states in USA in 2000 67
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'doodle'
Suggestion: doodle
...king the child clean the wall when they doodles, and so on. This would help children re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06853582555 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66825657905 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563862928349 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7330930829 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.214285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272033832293 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100024616972 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439243358655 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173278763809 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284265732493 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.