Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
It is hard to overstate the unshaken importance of food to people's wellbeing. However, people are still divided on whether the science of food should become an official subject at school. While it is believed that students should learn the importance and preparation of food, opponents of this contend that other academic subjects are more crucial. Despite some rationales behind both ways of thinking, I strongly advocate the need to study both groups of subjects
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the science of food is a vital subject that needs to be incorporated to the school curriculum. First and foremost, this field of science enables students to be equipped with knowledge about the nutritional values of food. They get a chance to know more about how to build a balanced diet that allows them to stay healthy and keep fit, which has become a topic of interests in the busy and hectic society. As a case in point, the subject teaches students that junk food and fast food are detrimental to their health, whereas vegetables are rich in nutritions and should be added to their daily meals. Additionally, cooking and preparing food is an essential skill they need to cultivate to survive on their own. This can be clearly seen in the case of undergraduates studying away from home, which requires them to be independent of their parents and know how to take care of themselves. Therefore, it is wholly warranted that the science of food should be given more attention in the academic environment.
On the other hand, there are compelling reasons why students should focus on academic subjects at school. These subjects can provide students with professional knowledge for their future careers as well as develop critial and logical thinking, which is pivotal in this era of inexorable development in various aspects of life. Furthermore, a tertiary degree, which can be obtained with the knowledge from these subjects, can boost students' opportunities of getting a stable job and earning a decent living in such a demanding job market. For the aforemention reasons, it is asserted that time and effort should be allocated to academic subjects instead of studying about food.
In conclusion, notwithstanding justifications behind both viewpoint, I believe that both academic subjects and the subject of food science and preparation should be made part of the school curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that for school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than parents Others argue that parents are not less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world They should therefore be introduced into classrooms and their programs used for direct teaching purposes However dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students Discuss bot 84
- Some people think that movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tionally, cooking and preparing food is a essential skill they need to cultivate ...
^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...jects and the science of food should be part of the school curriculum.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12218649518 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83967434309 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527331189711 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7386452427 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37081740669 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136889556711 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815498313389 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240238940729 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795873845519 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.