Computers are now the basis of the modern world. They should therefore be introduced into classrooms and their programs used for direct teaching purposes. However, dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion
In this day and age, computers have become increasingly ubiquitous. It is not difficult to see the applications of them in various facets of life, including the field of education. While it is believed that the use of computers at schools can be beneficial to the students' learning process, opponents of this argue that they can have detrimental effects on learners. From my perspective, despite some rationales behind both viewpoints, I strongly advocate that computers should be used wisely as a learning tool for students.
On the one hand, ever since its invention, computers have proved to be an extremely useful machines and can be utilized in education. These days, many lessons are delivered with the help of computers, which has turned out to be effective and much more understandable. According to researches, visuals and sounds involved when applying this method of teaching boosts students' understanding and memory, as well as inspiring them to study more. Additionally, implementing computers in classrooms enables students to familiarize themselves with technological advancements and cultivate the relevant skills. As a case in point, the presentation skills related to the use of computer can be essential for students later in their careers.
On the other hand, there are compelling reasons why it is believed that computers may engender some valid concerns. This is attributable to its additive feature. Nowadays, students tend to immerse themselves in the virtual world, spending a significant amount of time in front of screens. As a result, they are likely to develop some health problems, both mentally and physically. In other words, students may become irritated after long hours of working on the computers. They lose their composure more frequently, thus inadvertently damaging the relationships with others. Furthermore, focusing on the computers constantly may cause some problems with eyesight and diseases such as diabetes and obesity.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the justifications behind both viewpoints, I believe that with close supervision and moderate use, computers can be used effectively at schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-12 | quytnee | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | smiley | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | Jerryfsc | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | sonicmaster | 84 | view |
- Some people think that movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that is is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Please help me assess this essay Thank you Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money can be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea 84
- Some people believe that for school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than parents Others argue that parents are not less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53495440729 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19014590337 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4179610111 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.117647059 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248301436848 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728369569505 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472160872579 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147162694027 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348007750053 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53495440729 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19014590337 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4179610111 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.117647059 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248301436848 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728369569505 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472160872579 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147162694027 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348007750053 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.