In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In today's modern world, commercials have become an integral part of humans life, and corporations and companies often emphasise on the new features of their products in their advertisments. They tend to do so because they understand that customers are typically interested in items that provide unfamiliar experiences. As far as my opinion is concerned, this tendency bring about positive effects to the salers, as well as the buyers.
To commence with, companies usually advertise new features of their products to grap attetion from the public. Because curiosity could make a significant number of people purchase an item, brands could become more well-known and increase their revenue owing to this tendency. Japanese products, for instance, are generally popular for being designed to supprise the customers since their apperrance and their uses are not related, such as a pen could look like a toy, or an eraser could be similar to a candy.
Both corporations and individuals could benefit from this development. In terms of companies, their sales might increase which means they would have more fund to develop their premises, as well as new campaign and products. As a result, their brand would become bigger as times to come and would be able to expand and improve productivity. In customers terms, they are able to know better about a product before deciding to purchase it, and some could find an item that have feature perfectly suit for their needs. For example, wheelchairs with automaticly control systems could be beneficial to disabled people who can not use both their hands and legs.
In conclusion, businesses tend to advertise that their products are new in different ways because it could attract more buyers, and in my point of view, this is a positive development.
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...result, their brand would become bigger as times to come and would be able to expa...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'featured'.
Suggestion: featured
..., and some could find an item that have feature perfectly suit for their needs. For exa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15410958904 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75436798057 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1665843214 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300434638093 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114172630063 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797437027975 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205967030956 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476239368426 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...result, their brand would become bigger as times to come and would be able to expa...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'featured'.
Suggestion: featured
..., and some could find an item that have feature perfectly suit for their needs. For exa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15410958904 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75436798057 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1665843214 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300434638093 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114172630063 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797437027975 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205967030956 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476239368426 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.