Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is often believed that hiking the price of petrol can help resolve the growing problem of traffic congestion and city woes emanating from ambient pollution. I completely disagree with this idea because it is not a viable solution that can help meet long-term needs of the expanding economies.
From my point of view, while it is not a sustainable solution to raise the price of a commodity that has inelastic demand, economists believe that no matter how hard a government tries to force people out of car by making petrol expensive, more people will buy these commodities because they need these items to fulfil their basic needs. What I mean by this is that, in a developing country, where government has no plans to introduce an efficient public transport means, citizens are left to provide for their own means of conveyance. This boils down to either two wheeler or four wheeler exerting unrelenting pressure on exisiting infrastructure and mounting demand for petrol.
So far as solutions are concerned, the government needs to introduce policies to electrify cars rather than think of an alternative ways of making fuel price astronomically high. Besides, it should give impetus to the introduction of efficient and dependable public transport modes which are environmentally friendly. Pollution will subside once cleaner energy sources are tapped for making vehicles operational.
To sum up, traffic snarls and dirty air will not escape the cities by hiking the price of petrol. It warrants focus on finding out an alternatve energy source that can put less strain on the road and on the environment.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this overweigh its disadvantages 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Today many people getting married at the age of thirties and having children rather than marry at teen age Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...buy these commodities because they need this items to fuel their basic needs. What I...
^^^^
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'efficient public transport'.
Suggestion: efficient public transport
...re government has no plans to introduce an efficient public transport means, they are left to provide for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...ars rather than think of an alternative ways to making fuel price astronomically hig...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, i mean, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09056603774 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83577812839 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62641509434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.947331922 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.636363636 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105802062439 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384430663121 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354230081818 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636896437836 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01960847988 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.