Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
The issue above suggests that the governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequence are opaque. It is reasonable that the gorvernment should patron such research that the results are probable for using their budget efficiently. However, most of the scientific research cannot estimate their result. Moreover, the funds from the government are necessary for many of the research. Therefore, I do not agree with the statement above.
Admittedly, governments are obliged to use their public budget efficiently because its source are from citizens of the country. As a result, government should make specific criteria so that they can prevent unnecessary use of their money. Since, one of the most important criteria is the result of the research, the government should give weight on assessing the fund for the experiment. Without proper explanation on the research, government cannot withstand the possible danger the research may have. Thus, since the government has limmited budget, it might be efficient to use their resource on more probable research.
However, the statement above does not consider one of the most fundamental part of science. Most of the scientific research is based on understanding and experimenting unpredictable result. For example, in the experiment of making a covid-19 vaccine, most of the research are held based on unknown result. Many companies tried to develop this vaccine but only few had made result. Furthermore, in the case of semiconductor development, much of the research were based on unidentified result. You can understand this situation by how Samsung developed D-ram integrated chip.
As a matter of fact, it is almost impossible for individual research to get fundings other than the government without ensuring the possible result. In the case of space experiment, it was impossible for individual company to get sponcered other than the government, until the advent of space-X. Many of its basis technology does not assure the possible outcome of the research. Moreover, the cost on these experiments are extremely taxing since it require numerous expensive tools that normal laboratory cannot afford. Thus the company space-X was also able to emerge because there were fundings by NASA. Therefore, to maintain the technology, government should stand forward sponsoring these experiements.
In conclusion, it might be necessary for governments to make preferrable actions to use their limmited budget efficiently. However, much of the scientific research has unpresented result and it is simply impossible to predict an outcome. Thus, some scientific research can not get sufficientfund other than the government. Therefore, the government should sponsor scientific research even though the result cannot be conjectured.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | georgez | 58 | view |
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people should always tell the truth
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people should always tell the truth
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 60
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 521, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s that normal laboratory cannot afford. Thus the company space-X was also able to em...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55633802817 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00933565463 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488262910798 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.269816174 60.3974514979 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0384615385 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11538461538 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353428941744 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109399720714 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126022007755 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224254546636 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129388574191 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.