Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power
should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new
leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Every field experiences changes in theories and methodologies prevailing in the area as time passes, be it business, politics, education or government. The innovations happening in the field provides new opportunities of growth, by introducing some improvements over the pre-existing techniques. But, in order to apply these in the field, we need people who are up-to-date in the given field, and are aware of the advances happening currently. Moreover, if someone is in power for a long time, he/she would get obsessed with it over time, and the plans for betterment would find a place for themselves in some corner. Hence we need to make sure that leadership changes sufficiently often in any field.
Consider the example of a democratic government. Suppose a party is in power for considerably long time (say 15 years). The leaders of the party would start becoming attached to their authorities and power in the government. If these leaders gain too much power, they would start misusing it in order to ensure that they stay in power. The needs of the people would become secondary to the government. Hence, the government leadership should switch after a tenure, so that there remains a tussle for power among the various parties in the country, and this competition would eventually be very favourable for the country’s overall growth.
The field of education is no different. The constant influx of knowledge that any technical field experiences due to active research needs to reach the students via the books they read and the lessons they are taught. To ensure this, the leaders of an educational institutions must be well-aware of the advancements doing on in different fields, which in turn needs a change of leadership after specific durations.
But this does not mean that the old leadership should become insignificant and obsolete after this change of power takes place. Any new leader needs guidance from an experienced leader, who held the reigns of the job for several years, and understands the nuances and intricacies of the job. Their knowledge would help the new leadership understand his/her duties and make sure that the legacy of the leadership is carried forward, just with a change of face. This is extremely important, since any kind of lousiness or incompetence observed in the leadership would make the entire enterprise crumble due to lack of faith in the authority.
Hence, I believe that those in power must step down after some period of time (depending on the field), and new leadership should be given a chance in order to ensure growth of the enterprise. But the new leadership must go hand-in-hand with the old leadership in order to understand the working of the enterprise and ensure a fast shift of power and a smoother transitioning into power.
- The general welfare of a nation s people is a better indication of that nation s greatness than are the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In deve 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 62
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 83
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 619, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... a place for themselves in some corner. Hence we need to make sure that leadership ch...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'institution'?
Suggestion: institution
...ure this, the leaders of an educational institutions must be well-aware of the advancements ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: AT_THE_REIGNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'held the reins'?
Suggestion: held the reins
...uidance from an experienced leader, who held the reigns of the job for several years, and under...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 64, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hose in power must step down after some period of time depending on the field, and new leaders...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05627705628 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88667019702 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1238394795 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231017721315 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710981564396 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043657918142 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136420551949 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312221237347 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.