The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Talent, by definition, is the intrinsic quality of being so great and wonderful at doing a task or profession. Some may argue that talent of a popular musician is best accessed long after the death of such musician.But others would state that the talent of a musician is accurately determined during his or her life time. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that the talent of a popular musician is best known during his or her life time as a musician.
The number of show or performance a musician is called upon to make is a great determinant of talent. Apart from coming up with different musics at specific interval of period, being called to perform in either a small or big event is a great determinant of how talented the musician is. Consider two musician, one who receives offer more often to perform and the other who hadly receive offer then it signals that the former is more talented than the latter.
International recognition also a crucial factor which accurately checked the talent of a musician. A musician who receives more international recognition than his/her counterpart is a proof that the musician is talented. This is also a measure of fame in the music industry.
Nonetheless, several generations after the demise of a musician opinion of people about the musician life's work is imperative to assessed how talented the musician is. However, this lack accuracy because the absence of the musician might leaves a great reduction in how people love his/her work as a result of the presence of more and more upcoming and talented individual musician.
In conclusion, it is clear that the real talent of a popular musician is assessed whilst still alive than after death. The number of out call performance and international recognition are better used to access musician performance during his/her life time and not the opinion of people after demise. If anything, that a popular musician talent is honestly assessed after several generations of demise serves only as a contrast so we can understand what real talent really is.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal 55
- The following was written as part of a study weighing the benefits of a new construction project in the city of Winterville Car racing is extremely popular in the city of Winterville over 20 000 Winterville residents attended the state s annual 500 lap ra 70
- The ancient Oppo tribe has long been thought to have hunted only with wooden spears because none of their cave paintings depict bows or arrows Recently however flint arrowheads have been found among the fossilized bones of ibex animals thought to be a sta 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 50
- Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...at doing a task or profession. Some may argue that talent of a popular musician is be...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...d long after the death of such musician.But others would state that the talent of a...
^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...accurately determined during his or her life time. After weighing the evidence, it is cer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...usician is best known during his or her life time as a musician. The number of show or...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'musician' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'musicians'.
Suggestion: musicians
... talented the musician is. Consider two musician, one who receives offer more often to p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 247, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...ess musician performance during his/her life time and not the opinion of people after dem...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, honestly, however, if, may, nonetheless, really, so, still, then, apart from, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9711815562 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79961948526 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466858789625 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5653824919 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.214285714 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39646728372 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1601145144 0.0831039109588 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083438460107 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240440422907 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713421054044 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.