the following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the super screen movie production company
'' according to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past few year, fewer people attended the Super Screen Movie Production movies than in any other year.
And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about Super Screen Movie actually increased during the past year. clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available.
Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.''
According to the memo, the director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company suggested that the company should allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public about the awareness that movies of good quality are available through advertisement. The fact that the company thinks that the public are not aware of the availability of movies of good quality does not make a cogent reason for the decrease in the number of people who attended Super Screen-produce movie. I find the argument unconvincing on several grounds.
Firstly, the director only think that there is decrease in viewer due to lack of awareness about availability of good quality movie. The directors needs to ask the viewers why they don't attend Super Screen movie unlike before so as to know the root of the lack of viewers.
Also, the director thinks that if there is increase in awareness of good quality movies as a result of the interview, there will be turnaround in the number of people who attend the super screen movies. Meanwhile, the director may not carry it interview with majority of those who patronize the company, that is maybe only few people out of those interviewed patronize the company.
Therefore, the director should interview close to hundred percent sample of those that patronize the company so as to get the major reasons for lack of viewers and to be able to also suggest solution to the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | Eurus Psycho Version | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | riyarmy | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Saket Choudhary | 68 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Tanvi Sanandiya | 55 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 53
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complian 37
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- the following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the super screen movie production company according to a recent report from our marketing department during the past few year fewer people attended the Super Screen Movie Production movie 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... author claims its true and I agree that instilling the sense of cooperation and ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... objectives of the group successfully. For example, In school group aiming to c...
^^^
Line 6, column 188, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'prepares'.
Suggestion: prepares
... the success of the project. This habit prepare each member of such group to prepare in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...government, Industry, or other fields. On the contrary, competition provide sel...
^^^
Line 8, column 68, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'builds'?
Suggestion: builds
...n provide selfish interest. Although it build individual courage to stand alone and a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in summary, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.088 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93253201176 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 215.323595506 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.2486444033 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560229633948 0.243740707755 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.266288328854 0.0831039109588 320% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.267448755701 0.0758088955206 353% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370270944247 0.150359130593 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.273088317032 0.0667264976115 409% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 100.480337079 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... author claims its true and I agree that instilling the sense of cooperation and ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... objectives of the group successfully. For example, In school group aiming to c...
^^^
Line 6, column 188, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'prepares'.
Suggestion: prepares
... the success of the project. This habit prepare each member of such group to prepare in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...government, Industry, or other fields. On the contrary, competition provide sel...
^^^
Line 8, column 68, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'builds'?
Suggestion: builds
...n provide selfish interest. Although it build individual courage to stand alone and a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in summary, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.088 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93253201176 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 215.323595506 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.2486444033 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560229633948 0.243740707755 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.266288328854 0.0831039109588 320% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.267448755701 0.0758088955206 353% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370270944247 0.150359130593 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.273088317032 0.0667264976115 409% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 100.480337079 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.