In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years

Essay topics:

In any profession - business, politics, education, government - those in power should step down after five years.

Every business, government, institution works on some chain o command which starts from the head or the institute havinq the most power to all the clerks or peons working there. It's said that those in the power should step down after five years. I do agree with the statement but only to certain extent as it is not wise to change the head o the institute every Ilve years without any compelling reason.
The main reason of supporting this statement is that when a person comes to the power or becomes the head of the institute he needs to achieve a level of seniority or else it won't be good for the institute. In achieving seniority many people become overaged and then after a tenure of five years it might be possible that due to their age the position is not suitable for them. As the head of the institute one needs to get updated with all the things around them and should think in a way which can help advance the institute. Sometimes for people of some older age it is diffcult for them to adapt to new innovations and implement them in there institute. Thus, for regular advancments of the company or institute a person should step down after five years if age of the person is above certain level.
Secondly, if a person at the head of institute steps down after five years it is very beneficial for the company itself. As a person who is running the institute for last five years might have introduce some policies that were not beneficial for the company. If that person continues to be the head of the company then he might try to implement that policy again and try to make it success but that won't be at all beneficial for the company. Sometimes change in the topmost level of institute makes a huge difference in the working of the institute and development of the institute. The new person who comes into the power might have some better ideas than the person who was in power and can help the company achieve new heights. Hence, people at power need to step down after some years
On the other hand sometimes changing the person who is the head of institute might be the reason of the downfall of the company. For example, let's consider in a
government the president o the company is not that young but the work he is doing is too good tor someone o his age. It he steps down and some other becomes the president of the country then it might lead to downfall of the company. Here the new person elected might be younger than the person who was in power but might have less knowledge and less information about the new innovations. Also it is possible that changing the head of the institute every five years might cause instability in the institute as employees need to have some time to get adiust to the new head and his workinq tectics and as they Just get used to those tectics it will be the time to change the person. This is not good from the company's perspective.
To sum up we can say that the change in the chain command is necessary from time to time but after looking at all the perpectives available. Before asking a person Ito step down we need to evaluate all the things the things or decisions person has taken after coming to the power. If those are good and helping the development Ithan he might continue for next tenure also. But if the person is not able to help in the development of the company than the person needs to step down from his position.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-16 HAN YEBIN 50 view
2023-12-29 mei_unavailable 83 view
2023-10-20 Juhong Park 16 view
2023-10-20 Juhong Park 16 view
2023-09-14 Isolus 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Vidit Gandhi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'introduced'.
Suggestion: introduced
...nstitute for last five years might have introduce some policies that were not beneficial ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... information about the new innovations. Also it is possible that changing the head o...
^^^^
Line 6, column 168, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ito) must be used with a third-person verb: 'steps'.
Suggestion: steps
...s available. Before asking a person Ito step down we need to evaluate all the things...
^^^^
Line 6, column 202, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the things'.
Suggestion: the things
...n Ito step down we need to evaluate all the things the things or decisions person has taken after com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 367, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...Ithan he might continue for next tenure also. But if the person is not able to help ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2772.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 627.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42105263158 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00399520894 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34732115235 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.352472089314 0.4932671777 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 897.3 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2206740792 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.52173913 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2608695652 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201458957044 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816110699549 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957297906951 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120146034707 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654520774165 0.0667264976115 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'introduced'.
Suggestion: introduced
...nstitute for last five years might have introduce some policies that were not beneficial ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... information about the new innovations. Also it is possible that changing the head o...
^^^^
Line 6, column 168, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ito) must be used with a third-person verb: 'steps'.
Suggestion: steps
...s available. Before asking a person Ito step down we need to evaluate all the things...
^^^^
Line 6, column 202, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the things'.
Suggestion: the things
...n Ito step down we need to evaluate all the things the things or decisions person has taken after com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 367, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...Ithan he might continue for next tenure also. But if the person is not able to help ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2772.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 627.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42105263158 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00399520894 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34732115235 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.352472089314 0.4932671777 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 897.3 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2206740792 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.52173913 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2608695652 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201458957044 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816110699549 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957297906951 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120146034707 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654520774165 0.0667264976115 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.