A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is a fundamental right for all people in a country, and the government is responsible for providing the best education to its citizens. The government plans the curriculum, and it is implemented all over the nation.
The notation states that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. While I partially agree with the statement, I believe that there should be options available for students to explore and learn outside the curriculum.
First of all, in the primary label, all students get the same education from the government because the same curriculum is followed all over the nation. Curriculums differ from nation to nation, and each nation has its own set of curricula according to the nation’s laws, beliefs, and history. All students get the same education until they enter college, so they are the same competent, and this creates a common ground for all students from different regions of the country. Geographical location hinders a student’s progress sometimes, but if the same curriculum is followed all over the nation, students will get the same education and a fundamental knowledge-based society will be created. For instance, a student on a hill track has little access to different things than a student in a town or major city, but the same curriculum makes for a common playing field.
Additionally, when the students enter college, all students have the same educational background, so there is no knowledge gap among students, and they can study different majors as their choices and make an impact. On the other hand, if they enter the job market, they can have an impact, and the nation gets the best output from the students of their educational background. For instance, the Japanese government follows the same curriculum all over the nation, and it creates the same work ethic and manner among students, and the nation is progressing.
However, all students are not equally intelligent and don’t have the same family background. Some students are more competent than others and want to explore different fields at an early age, so there should be a necessary environment for these kinds of students so that they can explore more and enrich their minds.
In conclusion, it is important that a nation require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college but there must be more exploration for more competent students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 520, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'progress'.
Suggestion: sometimes progress
...ographical location hinders a student’s progress sometimes, but if the same curriculum is followed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1157635468 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79402096988 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431034482759 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.77640449438 619% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1006353019 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.466666667 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0666666667 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.603498197121 0.243740707755 248% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.263117824103 0.0831039109588 317% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18941814348 0.0758088955206 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380488694289 0.150359130593 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17999888789 0.0667264976115 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.