Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas. Why? Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
It is true that today many fewer people, especially young people, work on the land than in the past. While some reasons can be put forward to explain this trend, I firmly believe that it is necessary to attract many more young people into farming.
There is one major reason why fewer young people are now engaged in agriculture. Advances in technology have completely revolutionised how food is produced. The traditional methods, which were labour-intensive, have become obsolete . Sophisticated agricultural machinery has replaced people, in a process which has increased in intensity over the years. Young people are today rarely seen on farms. Lacking job prospects, they were among the first to join the mass exodus to the cities.
However, I would argue that more young people are needed in farming today. Firstly, modern methods of farming are increasing environmental degradation and provoking an ecological crisis. Farming techniques, for example organic growing, which are environmentally-friendly are the only sustainable way to produce food, and these techniques require much more human labour. Secondly, when young people migrate to cities, they often cannot find work and experience a sense of alienation. They live in a concrete jungle without a feeling of community that they had in their rural villages. Finally, to help to alleviate environmental problems in the countryside today, young people should be encouraged to study agronomy and ecology. Applying their knowledge to sustainable farming, young people will be mentally stimulated and physically fit.
In conclusion, the use of technology in modern industrialised agriculture puts profit before people, but more young people in farming will result in the application of technology to achieve sustainable development. This gives them a vital role in the future of humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | hinhin411 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | phuong_anh_07 | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | thaoduong1902 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 56
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 84
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 56
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e labour-intensive, have become obsolete . Sophisticated agricultural machinery h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50877192982 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16046009238 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7373891232 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3529411765 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359298275499 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104032992376 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088422434949 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194168404518 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772043576489 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.