It is easier and more affordable for people to visit other countries.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
The rate of tourism has increased during the past few decades, particularly in terms of international travel. Indeed, traveling across borders is now easier than ever before. Although some may argue that this trend has disadvantages, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, cross-national travel can have several negative impacts on travelers and local attractions. With regard to individuals, travelers might encounter culture shock and other cultural issues. Even worse, cultural differences can lead to misunderstandings, which will lead to conflicts between people from various cultures. I recall hearing about an individual who is left-handed visiting India. Many locals stared at him with disapproval when he used his left hand to eat. This must be the most unpleasant experience of his journey. At a local level, the severity of pollution would exacerbate. Foreign visitors might leave plastic bottles, cups, and various forms of waste behind, which destroys the ecosystem and affects marine life.
On the other hand, the increasing quantity of traveling between different countries can be more advantageous. The most obvious benefit is that people will be provided with diverse experiences and knowledge. When travelers spend time in different countries, they become more attuned to different cultures and perspectives, fostering open-mindedness and reducing discrimination. Having observed individuals from underprivileged backgrounds enduring various hardships, they will be able to lend a greater empathy. Another advantage worth considering is that it is advantageous for the nation's overall economy, which translates to improved living standards and prosperity. As travelers from all over the world fly to tourist destinations, commercial and private airlines yield substantial revenue. Additionally, the increased demand for hotels, restaurants, and resorts leads to job creation.
In conclusion, while cross-border travel entails several drawbacks, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Encouraging collaborative efforts among governments can ensure that international tourism benefits all stakeholders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | chino0301 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some companies sponsor sports and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some students choose to work or to travel for a period of time between leaving school and going to university However the experience of working is more useful preparation for adult life than traveling To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, in conclusion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07236842105 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29163087162 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0542842204 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871825202548 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242284322848 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314931255216 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421266618845 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348543075412 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.33 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.