Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
In recent years, a significant digital transformation has reshaped the way business meetings and training sessions, driven by the escalating adoption of online platforms. I will consider how this view brings several notable advantages, which I will elucidate in the folliwng paragraphs.
Regarding the merits, we must acknowledge that the global accessibility for web-based meetings and education sessions offered by virtual platforms (Zoom and Google meet) have shattered geographical boundaries. This newfound capability enables participants from around the world to convene in a single virtual event. Beyond fostering international collaboration, it ensures the preservation of valuable knowledge through the ability to record these sessions, not to mentions helping to those who unable to attend in real-time but also serves as a reference point for the future. Furthermore, cost-saving aspect of this transfromastion can impact on an organization’s budget. For example, it is cutting down on expenses related to airfare, accommodation, and other logistical costs. Consequently, it diminishes the need for frequent business travel, aligning with a more sustainable and budget-friendly approach.
By contrast, we must elucidate the various demerits of this issues that this abrupt change to the way people conduct meeting and training result in a lack o face-to -face interaction, pontentially dismissing the strong bonding between personal connections and team building. Moreover, issue related to the technical glitches, internet connectivity problems, or cybersecurity concerns will interrupt the flow of remotes meetings and training, which causing inefficiencies and frustration moments. Notably, the year 2022 witnessed the COVID-19 pandemic’s influence on remote work, which led to a staggering 238% surge in cyberattacks, underscoring the critical need for enhanced cybersecurity measures.
In conclusion, while some may perceive potentially drawbacks to certain respects, I would argue that the shift towards Internet-based meetings and training can be substantially significant. Those include elevating global accessibility as well as lowering an organization’s business trip budget.
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- Some people think the government should take measures regarding the healthy lifestyle of individuals Others think it must be managed by individuals Discuss both sides and give you opinion 89
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- New age celebrities from Instagram and TikTok are more famous for their glamorous lifestyle than their achievements Does this affect the children who follow them State your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... must elucidate the various demerits of this issues that this abrupt change to the w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12903225806 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45359605374 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683870967742 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1452876068 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.153846154 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157710335226 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501635198997 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517348977397 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976503948332 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417706380751 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.57 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... must elucidate the various demerits of this issues that this abrupt change to the w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12903225806 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45359605374 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683870967742 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1452876068 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.153846154 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157710335226 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501635198997 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517348977397 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976503948332 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417706380751 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.57 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.