should parents forbid their children to own smart phones?
Mobile Phones have instantly become a necessity without which life seems improbable. They are valuable gadgets that provide ease of communication and access to content, both informative and entertaining. Some parents, however, do not allow their children to possess a smartphone. I believe it is unjust to deprive young children of this handy device for reasons I will discuss in subsequent paragraphs.
With the world condensing into a global village and people coming closer through the power of the internet, people must make the best of this opportunity to connect and widen their networking experiences. Giving children mobile phones will not only make communication with families easier, but it will also allow them to interact with people around the globe. Furthermore, this will help them broaden their networking experiences and learn about the diverse cultures, unique standards of living, and socio-political atmosphere in their regions. For instance, my 15-year-old niece, who has a penchant for photography, used her phone as a tool to link up with a diaspora of artists who share the same creative inclinations through the Instagram application on her phone. It helped her to become cognizant of new photography techniques and share her work with others. This shows the importance of smartphones and why parents should allow their children to use this device.
Moreover, cell phones with internet access have now become a necessary commodity, especially for children. The emergence of the recent Covid pandemic transformed the conventional education system and changed the in-person teaching approach to one delivered online through the internet. It has, thus, become vital to give children phones to access online classes. Portable mobile phones make it possible for children to take their classes and submit their assignments on time. For example, my friend's daughter did not own a mobile phone had to rely on her mother's phone to access the classes. Since my friend also used the phone to attend meetings, their timings clashed, resulting in a build-up of assignments for her daughter. It was an eye-opener for my friend as she realized the importance of mobile phones in getting an education. Subsequently, she got her daughter a cell phone.
To sum up, I strongly advocate parents to permit their children to own mobile phones as it is a resource for them and a tool of immense significance in shaping their future.
- young people should take more risks than adults 76
- understanding concepts is more important than learning facts Do you agree or disagree 70
- should parents forbid their children to own smart phones 80
- funds to improve classes and libraries or on sports and extracurricular activities 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so government should offer internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88954678191 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9794004219 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.105263158 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292979675233 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970150812752 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796975885473 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200882347722 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680016502898 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.