Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable ti be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people feel that sharing scientific, business, and academic data is an appropriate option, whereas others think that there should be some restriction to sharing them without paying. This essay discusses both sides of this argument, and then I will my own perspective. On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of unlimited access to research consequences considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that it might be helpful for individuals who live in less developed countries to mitigate their problems by spending less money and time. It is also possible to say that it can prevent a crisis in special cases such as medical issues and curing diseases. One good illustration of this is related to the widespread illness[COVID] which has had to share the scientist's findings completely to discover the best way for saving the individual's life in all of the world. On the other hand, it is also possible to make an opposing case. It is often argued that in fact some of the crucial information must be protected in a suitable way because of their value. People often have this opinion because they need to compensate their sources for continuing their research. Furthermore, some data is potentially able to be used by inappropriate people, so putting some restrictions to control the access is necessary. A particularly good example here is to keep the military information on weapons. The publication of this type of information can have serious repercussions for abusive people. There are different kinds of similar samples in economic and academic fields too. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that putting restrictions on some information like military data to limit access is obligatory. Because if criminals have access to this information, it will lead to disastrous consequences.
- Nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job What problems this causes What are the solutions 73
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 56
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 73
- nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job what problems this causes what are the solutions 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 899, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...to discover the best way for saving the individuals life in all of the world. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 919, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... way for saving the individuals life in all of the world. On the other hand, it is also po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1034, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...g case. It is often argued that in fact some of the crucial information must be protected i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1084, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a suitable way" with adverb for "suitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e crucial information must be protected in a suitable way because of their value. People often ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, then, whereas, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17096774194 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03949205735 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4453230365 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257653901112 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074453856075 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449574428682 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257653901112 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.