Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued by some individuals, subjects such as mathematics and philosophy should be freely chosen rather than making mandatory because some children acknowledge them as tough subjects. I completely disagree with this statement as basic skills of these subjects are significant to build a strong background and mathematics and philosophy enhance ability to thinking critically.

Firstly, mathematics and philosophy are essential for every individual to make life orderly. There are many subjects the pupils might feel boring or even difficult, but it does not mean they are not important. For example, mathematical knowledge and ability to use them is effective way of tackling quantifiable problem such as shopping, paying bills and others daily activities. In addition, mathematical is associated with many other disciplines such as science, history, geography and economics. Likewise, philosophical premises develop potential to analyze and understand issues and solve then easily.

Secondly, subjects like mathematics and philosophy broaden critical thinking capacity of children, as they consist of abstract problems and pupils need to think logically to solve those problems. Furthermore, learning mathematics is good for our brain, when we solve these problems using different kinds of methods helps us to solve problems in our day to day life. Problem solving method, for instance, which is used step by step to do mathematical problems teaches to cope with challenges in personal life taking each pace after another. Similarly, philosophy improves critical thinking skills of children because it focuses them to think outside of their normal thought process and widens the perspectives towards something. This allows them to generate extra ways to deal with happening circumstances.

In conclusion, although some subjects are difficult to study and understand, children should not outweigh the importance of those subjects so that they could conduct personal and professional life smoothly in a logical way.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-28 trikhung777 67 view
2021-12-20 hoakhanhminh 84 view
2021-10-31 nfseg 73 view
2021-08-20 eyraen 78 view
2021-08-17 janeyackerman 56 view
Essays by user Sumita :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 468, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'coping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: coping
...tep to do mathematical problems teaches to cope with challenges in personal life taking...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 207, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical way" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...personal and professional life smoothly in a logical way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sional life smoothly in a logical way.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, likewise, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74503311258 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98553043135 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612582781457 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4484942271 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.461538462 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268344011037 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904909740054 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848726994317 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178181278021 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831755207393 0.056905535591 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.