Violence in the media promotes violence in society.
To what extent do you agree?
There is a belief that media encourages members of society to act abnormally by reporting acts of atrocity. In this essay, I disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why some social workers claim that the act of cruelty on TV trigger atrocity in real life. The first argument is that it encourages some people commit the same crime to gain popularity. Criminals often receive publicity upon apprehension, so some of the news followers want to gain fame by perpetrating a similar crime. Another reason that violence in mass media may mislead immature minds about the world. Young people may express themselves violently, once this kind of publication encourages them by immoral pictures. Furthermore, it frequently motives more people carry protection means. People, for example, in Kazakhstan tend to use guns as self-defence, which also increase crime rate.
However, some media presenters believe that reported act of cruelty has positive effects on society for the following reasons. First of all, it makes people aware of criminals. For example, newspapers often show pictures of former sex-offenders with description to notify people of their atrocious behavior. Secondly, media warns people of the consequences of breaking law. People are often unaware of possible implications if they decide to assault others, but with TV programs can deter them from their illegal intention. Finally, broadcasting both violence and subsequent apprehension usually persuades citizens that police officers work. People often blame the police force for their inaction; however, documentaries about various crimes with arrest may change their opinion about policemen.
In conclusion, even though sociologists argue that cruelty highlighted on mass media exacerbates brutal conduct in public, I am opposed to their opinion and think that such highlights discourages anti-social actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | avneet28 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | lokeshpareek87 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | being | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
- You have been invited to attend an interview for a place studying a course in a college. Unfortunately, because of a previous appointment, you cannot come at the time they wish.Write a letter to the admissions tutor:explain your position.apologise and off 73
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer people are walking there days.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to tackle this problem? 73
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public.To what extent do you agree? 84
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 73
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children, while others think it is the fault of the parentsDiscuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'disagree'
Suggestion: disagree
...ting acts of atrocity. In this essay, I disagrees with their point of view. Let us st...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...receive publicity upon apprehension, so some of the news followers want to gain fame by per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58965517241 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85995143935 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651724137931 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2887501792 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3529411765 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0686842393236 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248473569992 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423172562229 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407951279373 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00930061966868 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.