The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
In this varying world, change is the only constant. Perceptions, idealization, ethics, moral values, living standard, fashion and clothing, intellectuality everything changes so as the society’s heroes or it’s role model. Examining the characters of the men and women chosen by the society’s as heroes and its role model may be one of the way to understand the character of the entire society but perhaps it’s not the best way because of following three reasons.
First of all, characters of a society can be traced in to the recorded history that the historian left, and most of the time historian documents the characters of that specific period’s heroes and role models. With time, heroes and role model changes and historian marched for documenting new hero’s characters. For instance, Barak Obama once the chosen hero of the society is no longer representing the role model of the society after his term ends. So examining the characters of periodic role model may help to understand the character of the society of that particular period and it’s one way among several ways to accomplish the task not the best or universal way which will work irrespective of time and situation.
Additionally, society is composed of varying classes of people all don’t possess the very same characteristic. Philosopher, scientist, architect, singer, intellectuals, farmers, war heroes, lay people all are the part of a society and their characters vary in terms of their thinking, perceptions, living standard, ethics and so many more. In Indian subcontinent, Mahatma Gandhi is the all-time role model for his message of peace and nonviolent movement. Even he was assassin by a matador of the same society. If all could follow the path showed by Gandhi, perhaps he would not have to face that kind of inauspicious fate. As heroes and role model characters don’t represent the society’s characters as a whole, examining their characters will not make us understood fully.
While society encourage its people to follow the foot step and act like their temporary role model and believe that if all of them do these then the society will be utopian one and if it was the real scenario, then the proposed method perhaps would be the best way to understand the society. But unfortunately it does not happen in real world. Both in ancient and modern era there are so much unveiled characters of the chosen hero or role model that are not being introduced with the general people. A role model of any field, that may be politics, athletics, entertainment, may show their best performance or generous site in public while hiding their true self. It’s very daunting task to know all hereabouts of any person and then follow everything. As it is rarely possible to adopt every characters of a heroic figures their examination will not provide much information about the remaining society.
Moreover, a person can be celebrated once as a role model for any of his or her heroic act, or any principle, or advancement she or he has done to the society. But this same person can be ridiculed even hated by the society for other some reason or any kind of illicit act of his or her at later time. In this case, Hitler can be cited as good example. During second world war, he got huge supports from his followers but now he is considered as most hated persons in the world. Moreover, his characters, his perceptions didn’t represent the whole society’s characters. If one attempts to extrapolate characters of the society of second world war era solely examining the characters of Hitler, she may fall in illusion of very wrong concept. There are huge possibilities of the presence of people whose idea and opinions were not in accord with Hitler and they only supported for the sake of their life, for their survival.
There is no doubt that hero’s and role model’s characters influence the society’s characters to a great extent and their characteristics are cited everywhere as example but all society dwellers cannot acquire them and accomplish the task done by their model. With time hero and their influences changes and so people’s perceptions that’s why examining the characters of hero and role model may be good way but we need to find more valid method and suitable way that will works with every possible variable.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 47
- A nation should require all of students to study same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models 66
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situations such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey firstborn infant monkeys prod 40
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 755, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... any person and then follow everything. As it is rarely possible to adopt every ch...
^^
Line 4, column 818, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'figure'?
Suggestion: figure
...e to adopt every characters of a heroic figures their examination will not provide much...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, while, for instance, kind of, no doubt, first of all, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 43.0 14.8657303371 289% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3617.0 2235.4752809 162% => OK
No of words: 727.0 442.535393258 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97524071527 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.19258485972 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81105159208 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 312.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429160935351 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1141.2 704.065955056 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3827762059 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.178571429 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9642857143 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462875156292 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129859201371 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146301242785 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304498554417 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133856349225 0.0667264976115 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.