Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The world is a myriad of problems, and each resident of a country looks upto its government to resolve its issues. Where people in some countries fight for food other long for mental heath or social injustice to their state. Each individual in a country feels their issues are worth noticing and it is obvious to divert our attention to what is apparent rather than what’s building forth in the future.
I’ll lay my grounds between both the statements. Definitely one would bend towards what is apparent and it would tend to solve the problems at hand. The present condition has arisen due to lack of correct measures taken in past, hence it clearly implies, if the actions taken are not corrected at the moment will reflect in future. Global warming, is a fine example to consider, scientists like James Hensan, have foresighted issues like global warming and climate change at the time when the current society had no clue. The theories which seemed practical decades ago have proven right today and insidiously we have started to bear its repurcurssions. Hence it is evident to believe that the problems anticipated for future will definitely prove deleterious and if not worked on them now, the harm would be inexorable.
Some critics might argue and would present issues like - poverty, famine, floods, lack of education, and various diseases which are affecting the world. COVID 19 can be an inevitable example of a present day ‘malady’ which have left untouched none of the countries in a global map. The disease which was ignored initially, rapidly spread, it has caused and still causing deleterious effects on the mankind. It needed immediate attention, the research labs, doctors and COVID warriors start to function to eliminate and rectify it. Turning a blind eye to a disease is no solution and no one can afford it.
The government is function need to pick their battles, in the matter of working for its constituents, there can be one-stop solution for all. A highly functional and develop country like France, which has laid its plan in advance can enforce ‘Paris Climate Agreement 2050’ where they are working 30 years in advance or a country like Netherlands where crime-rate is extremely neglegible. The governments might not have many immediate problems at hand and can easily resolve few problems at hand or work for future at the same time. While countries like India, where poverty rate and population both are high, jobs possibility are less and hence poverty rate is bound to increase in future as well, the government needs to resolve immediate problems. Hence government of India came up with programmes like Startup-India and Digitalised India in order to resolve the issues at hand. Therefore it is quite inflammatory to decide and to come on one concrete conclusion for all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 71
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 60
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 34
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...n due to lack of correct measures taken in past, hence it clearly implies, if the actio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ot corrected at the moment will reflect in future. Global warming, is a fine example to c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ave started to bear its repurcurssions. Hence it is evident to believe that the probl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 751, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nt needs to resolve immediate problems. Hence government of India came up with progra...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 882, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...in order to resolve the issues at hand. Therefore it is quite inflammatory to decide and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01276595745 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66244747156 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.543393731 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.8 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126084896063 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359164465311 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339457060672 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707569251892 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246460808769 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.