in some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better?
While bicycles are rarely used in some cities, it is surprising that bikes are becoming more popular in other cities. My essay will discuss certain reasons for this phenomenon and then I will give my own opinions about these developments.
It is understandable that the popularity of bicycles is not the same in every city. This phenomenon can be explained by two main underlying reasons. Firstly, most people in some urban areas choose using cars instead of bikes because it takes a considerable amount of time to travel by bikes. It fails to benefit the dwellers of major cities when their pace of working life is so rush that would eclipse the values of using bicycles impacting on both health and the environment. Secondly, the reverse trend happens more in some rural areas where the environment is clearer and greener due to the fact that people obviously prefer to join the pure air where does not have traffic jams rather than the polluted one in a crowded city.
In my opinion, I believe that the increase in the popularity of bicycles is a good development because of its positive impact on society. Firstly, it contributes much to reducing not only carbon dioxide releasing from cars and motorbikes but also traffic congestion. Secondly, it proves that people’s awareness has been changing in a better way as a signal that they start realizing how their use of cars impacts their surroundings and concerns about the environment.
In conclusion, there are two opposite trends in the use of bicycles in some cities and I am convinced that the increase in the use of bikes is a better development in our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Gracy Maisuriya | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | ujjwalsatyam9211@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | mohit 2000 | 96 | view |
| 2020-09-06 | tranguyen1234 | 67 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 89
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and Government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas Does advantage outweigh the disadvantage 73
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 61
- The best way for Governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day and 7 days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
... most people in some urban areas choose using cars instead of bikes because it takes ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87050359712 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71931026368 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579136690647 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8846463699 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249368715835 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839038094929 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590091024263 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144811008089 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335375450541 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.